How can I match an alpha character with a regular expression. I want a character that is in \w
but is not in \d
. I want it unicode compatible that's why I cannot use [a-zA-Z]
.
views:
335answers:
2What about:
\p{L}
You can to use this document as reference: Unicode Regular Expressions
EDIT: Seems Python doesn't handle Unicode expressions. Take a look into this link: Handling Accented Characters with Python Regular Expressions -- [A-Z] just isn't good enough
Another references:
Your first two sentences contradict each other. "in \w
but is not in \d
" includes underscore. I'm assuming from your third sentence that you don't want underscore.
Using a Venn diagram on the back of an envelope helps. Let's look at what we DON'T want:
(1) characters that are not matched by \w
(i.e. don't want anything that's not alpha, digits, or underscore) => \W
(2) digits => \d
(3) underscore => _
So what we don't want is anything in the character class [\W\d_]
and consequently what we do want is anything in the character class [^\W\d_]
Here's a simple example (Python 2.6).
>>> import re
>>> rx = re.compile("[^\W\d_]+", re.UNICODE)
>>> rx.findall(u"abc_def,k9")
[u'abc', u'def', u'k']
Further exploration reveals a few quirks of this approach:
>>> import unicodedata as ucd
>>> allsorts =u"\u0473\u0660\u06c9\u24e8\u4e0a\u3020\u3021"
>>> for x in allsorts:
... print repr(x), ucd.category(x), ucd.name(x)
...
u'\u0473' Ll CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER FITA
u'\u0660' Nd ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
u'\u06c9' Lo ARABIC LETTER KIRGHIZ YU
u'\u24e8' So CIRCLED LATIN SMALL LETTER Y
u'\u4e0a' Lo CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-4E0A
u'\u3020' So POSTAL MARK FACE
u'\u3021' Nl HANGZHOU NUMERAL ONE
>>> rx.findall(allsorts)
[u'\u0473', u'\u06c9', u'\u4e0a', u'\u3021']
U+3021 (HANGZHOU NUMERAL ONE) is treated as numeric (hence it matches \w) but it appears that Python interprets "digit" to mean "decimal digit" (category Nd) so it doesn't match \d
U+2438 (CIRCLED LATIN SMALL LETTER Y) doesn't match \w
All CJK ideographs are classed as "letters" and thus match \w
Whether any of the above 3 points are a concern or not, that approach is the best you will get out of the re module as currently released. Syntax like \p{letter} is in the future.