Ultimate Quality Development System
Does anyone have any experience with this or a similar methodology, good or bad?
+1
A:
It reads like a mix between SBOs(*) and a guide to winding people up:
A reviewer reviews the completed work, and provides feedback: at least one good thing about the work, at least one area that needs improvement, and a judgement as to whether the good qualities ultimately outweigh the bad, i.e. whether the branch should be merged.
Cringe.
Other than that, perfect.
(*) Statements of the Bleedingly Obvious
Nick Pierpoint
2008-10-27 07:49:12