views:

362

answers:

4

Hello guys,

I want to use Stream class in scala to repeat a given list infinitely.

For example the list (1,2,3,4,5) I want to create a stream that gives me (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3....)

So that I can wrap the take operation. I know this can be implemented in other ways, but I wanna do it this way for some reason, just humor me :)

So the idea is that with this infinite cycle created from some list, I can use take operation, and when it reaches the end of the list it cycles.

How do I make a stream which simply repeats a given list?

+1  A: 

Stolen blatently from the excellent Scala by Example book, chapter 12, and with a few modifications:

def repeatedSeq(idx: Int, lst:Seq[Int]): Stream[Int] = Stream.cons(lst(idx), repeatedSeq((idx + 1)%lst.length, lst))

for(i <- repeatedSeq(1,List(1,1,2,3,5))) println(i)

This works for all Seq types (unless they can't be read from multiple times, of course). Might not be efficient if the .length call is slow. Tested in Scala 2.7.7.

Justin W
"unless they can't be read from multiple times, of course"But when you're talking about sequences, you should always assume that this is the case.
James Moore
+2  A: 

Here's an implementation which doesn't assume that length is efficient:

def rep[A](seq: Seq[A]) = {
  def inner(proj: Seq[A]): Stream[A] = {
    if (proj.isEmpty)
      inner(seq)
    else
      Stream.cons(proj.first, inner(proj drop 1))
  }

  if (seq.isEmpty)
    Stream.empty
  else
    inner(seq)
}

This should run in constant time for any Seq (including List or even Stream) and only imposes a constant time overhead to populate each element. Also, it works even for infinite sequences. So, you can call rep on an infinite Stream and the resulting Stream will be equivalent to the input.

Daniel Spiewak
+2  A: 

There is a simple way with Stream#flatten in scala 2.8

Welcome to Scala version 2.8.0.r20542-b20100116020126 (Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, Java 1.6.0_18).
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.

scala> def cycle[T](seq: Seq[T]) = Stream.from(0).flatten(_ => seq)
cycle: [T](seq: Seq[T])scala.collection.immutable.Stream[T]

scala> cycle(1::2::3::Nil)
res0: scala.collection.immutable.Stream[Int] = Stream(1, ?)

scala> res0.take(10)
res1: scala.collection.immutable.Stream[Int] = Stream(1, ?)

scala> res0.take(10).toList
res2: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1)
Eastsun
Interesting. How does that work?
Daniel
+2  A: 

Very similar to @Eastsun's, but a bit more intention revealing. Tested in Scala 2.8.

scala> val l  = List(1, 2, 3)
l: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)

scala> Stream.continually(l.toStream).flatten.take(10).toList
res3: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1)

Alternatively, with Scalaz:

scala> import scalaz._
import scalaz._

scala> import Scalaz._
import Scalaz._

scala> val l = List(1, 2, 3)
l: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)

scala> l.toStream.repeat[Stream].join.take(10).toList
res7: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1)
retronym
I liked this answer the best, continually on the Stream companion object is really what I was looking for. Also combined with flatten and tolist I get exactly what I want :)BTW, somestream.join.take(10).toList, can someone elaborate on the need for object.function() notation and why it is needed here? Usually you can have "seq take 10", and would something like "seq take 10.toList" work?
Felix
I think it's worth noting that "Stream.continually()" was apparently not present in previous releases from 2.8
Felix
In 2.7, `Stream.continually` was `Stream.const` and `streams.flatten` was `Stream.concat(streams)`
retronym
Perhaps you could move the comparison of method invocation with and without the '.' to a new question.
retronym