views:

223

answers:

2

I have some sample code which is using factories. I'd like to clean up the code by removing the factories and use Guice instead. I attempted to do this but I hit a small roadblock. I am really new to Guice, so I am hoping someone can help me out here.

Existing client code (Using factories):

public class MailClient {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MailConfig config = MailConfigFactory.get();
        config.setHost("smtp.gmail.com");
        Mail mail = MailFactory.get(config);
        mail.send();
    }
}

My attempt to refactor using Guice:

//Replaces existing factories
public class MailModule extends AbstractModule {

    @Override
    protected void configure() {
        bind(Mail.class)
        .to(MailImpl.class);

        bind(MailConfig.class)
        .to(MailConfigImpl.class);
    }
}

public class MailImpl implements Mail {

    private final MailConfig config;

    @Inject
    public MailImpl(MailConfig config) {
        this.config = config;
    }

    public void send() { ... }
}

public class MailClient {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MailModule mailModule = new MailModule();
        Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(mailModule);
        MailConfig config = injector.getInstance(MailConfig.class);
        config.setHost("smtp.gmail.com");
        Mail mail = //??
        mail.send();
     }
}

How would I construct an instance of MailImpl using the object config in my revised MailClient? Should I be using Guice in this way?

A: 

2 solutions are possible: 1) bind the config as a guice object also, including its host parameter. then just inject Mail, in your main mehtod you cna ignore the fact that mail has further dependencies.

2) mail must be configured individually for each send (recipient?). then you have no choice, but create it yourself using MailFactory.

Andreas Petersson
+2  A: 

Take a look at AssistedInject. It appears to address this problem.

Jesse Wilson