Is there any advantage to using __construct()
instead of the class's name for a constructor in PHP?
example:
class Foo {
function __construct(){
//do stuff
}
}
OR
class Foo {
function Foo(){
//do stuff
}
}
Is there any advantage to using __construct()
instead of the class's name for a constructor in PHP?
example:
class Foo {
function __construct(){
//do stuff
}
}
OR
class Foo {
function Foo(){
//do stuff
}
}
__construct
was introduced in PHP5. It is the way you are supposed to do it now. I am not aware of any advantages per se, though.
From the PHP manual:
For backwards compatibility, if PHP 5 cannot find a __construct() function for a given class, it will search for the old-style constructor function, by the name of the class. Effectively, it means that the only case that would have compatibility issues is if the class had a method named __construct() which was used for different semantics
If you're on PHP5 I would recommend using __construct
to avoid making PHP look elsewhere.
In PHP 5 the advantage would be that performance would be better. It will look for a constructor by the name of __construct
first and if it doesn't find that, it will look for constructors by the name of className
. So if it finds a constructor by the name __construct
it does not need to search for a constructor by the name className
.
The main advantage I see for __construct, is that you don't have to rename your constructor if you change your class name.
Forward compatibility. There's always a chance that legacy code that's left in the language for backwards compatibility's sake will be removed in a future version.
I agree with gizmo, the advantage is so you don't have to rename it if you rename your class. DRY.
Similarly, if you have a child class you can call parent::__construct() to call the parent constructor. If further down the track you change the class the child class inherits from, you don't have to change the construct call to the parent.
It seems like a small thing, but missing changing the constructor call name to your parents classes could create subtle (and not so subtle) bugs.
For example, if you inserted a class into your heirachy, but forgot to change the constructor calls, you could started calling constructors of grandparents instead of parents. This could often cause undesirable results which might be difficult to notice.
The best advantage of using __contruct()
instead of ClassName()
is when extending classes. It is much easier to call parent::__construct()
instead of parent::ClassName()
, as it is reusable among classes and the parent can be changed easily.