I want to create an application like this:
What is the most efficient way to create this real time application ?
Flash ? Long polling ? Http Streaming ? or anything else ?
Thanks ;)
views:
539answers:
2
+10
A:
For now, long polling is probably the best solution. Many big-name sites have long polling implementations, including Facebook, Google and eBay. Not everyone has Flash installed/enabled in their browsers. In the future Web Sockets might be able to do an easier job of it for us.
Update: As of this writing, the WebSocket API is implemented in the latest WebKit (Chrome/Safari) and Firefox 4 beta. There is also a public snapshot build of Opera available for download with an implementation of the API. This means testing the API is widely available. For more information, see this answer.
Andy E
2010-03-13 21:43:34
+1 I like long polling. The future might be different but I wouldn't go with Flash.
Plynx
2010-03-13 21:46:48
I have used phpfreechat ( that use long polling ) and with only 20 people is very very very slow !! Why ?I need to create a real time app for million of people simultanely !!
xRobot
2010-03-13 21:57:46
@xRobot: Have you checked the FAQ? [http://www.phpfreechat.net/faq] It offers a solution for one performance issue related to disk access. Other than that you require a very high powered server to handle millions of connections at the same time. Normal http requests are open->get data->close, so simultaneous connections are fewer. With long polling it's open->wait for data->close, so many simultaneous are almost guaranteed. Servers can only handle a limited amount of concurrent connections, and you get what you pay for, if you catch my drift!
Andy E
2010-03-13 22:56:02
I don't think Google use Long-Poll to implement Comet. At least, GMail implements comet with XHR-streaming.
Morgan Cheng
2010-03-21 10:27:15
@Morgan Cheng: Right you are. I heard that XHR-streaming was problematic with Internet Explorer, but it appears Google found a way around that. http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/2006/02/what-else-is-burried-down-in-the-depths-of-googles-amazing-javascript/
Andy E
2010-03-21 11:41:24
+1, the best way to do that's completely cross-browser is long-polling, which is implemented in a number of comet servers. The hack mentioned for gtalk is htmlfile streaming, which is different and has its own limitations: http://cometdaily.com/2007/11/18/ie-activexhtmlfile-transport-part-ii/
jvenema
2010-03-22 14:50:28
+1
A:
I don't think long-polling is most efficient way to do Comet. Anyway, it sends new HTTP request after response is got. It cost more extra HTTP requests than HTTP streaming.
But, long-polling might be more reliable and easier to implement than HTTP streaming. According to this article in Google Code, HTTP streaming might not be functional if intermediate HTTP proxy buffers content.
It is interesting that GMail doesn't use long-polling. With the help of Http sniffer, it is clear that it uses HTTP streaming for Comet.
Morgan Cheng
2010-03-22 08:43:56
Also Facebook don't use long polling ? Do you know any example for http streaming ? Thans ^_^
xRobot
2010-03-22 10:17:22
I haven't test it personally, but I'm told that Facebook chat is implemented by long-polling.GMail is Http Streaming. So is Outlook Web Access.
Morgan Cheng
2010-03-22 10:38:35
@xRobot, if you are looking forward to how-to, this URL is a good summary： http://cometdaily.com/2007/12/11/the-future-of-comet-part-1-comet-today/
Morgan Cheng
2010-03-22 10:41:35