In which class is the length
field defined in Java (e.g. for array length)?
Will I be able to see it defined say in Object
class?
EDIT : Why was this field so designed(any thing related with security or memory efficiency)?
In which class is the length
field defined in Java (e.g. for array length)?
Will I be able to see it defined say in Object
class?
EDIT : Why was this field so designed(any thing related with security or memory efficiency)?
You need to be a bit more specific than that.
A variable length can exist in any class. If you mean from the API then you are probably looking for the Array.
Some classes have a length() method.
In java with arrays you can do this. For example:
String[] a = new String [] {"a","b","c"};
int length = a.length;
Length would be 3;
There is no single answer to this question. Anyone can include a length
variable in a class, but there's no guarantee that it exists -- or, if it does exist, that it's public -- in any given class. You really just have to read the source for the class you're interested in.
I will say that in the widely-used JavaBean convention, classes that could reasonably have a length attribute but don't have a public variable length
often have getLength()
and setLength()
methods. That's better than a public variable for a number of reasons that are kind of out of scope for your question, but if you're interested, check out this related SO question.
Arrays are not like regular classes, they are a special case defined in the Java Language Specification. So the .length public final variable is defined in the Java Language Specification, but it is not actually defined anywhere in a .java or a .class file.
Any class can have a field called length
. Just add it.
Arrays do not have a length
field; they have something which looks like such a field:
int[] a = new int[10];
System.out.println("array length is: " + a.length);
but it is not really a plain field, because this does not compile:
int[] a = new int[10];
a.length = 42; // <- here the compiler gets grumpy
and, at the JVM level, the array length is accessed with a specific opcode (arraylength
) and not the generic instance field access opcode (getfield
).
Array types are special in Java. This is an excerpt from JLS 10.7 Array Members
The members of an array type are all of the following:
- The
public final
fieldlength
, which contains the number of components of the array (length may be positive or zero).- The
public
methodclone
, which overrides the method of the same name in classObject
and throws no checked exceptions. The return type of the clone method of an array typeT[]
isT[]
.- All the members inherited from class Object; the only method of Object that is not inherited is its
clone
method.
Despite this, there are still old-standing bugs when you're using reflection on arrays: neither length
nor clone
could be found through reflection (bug# 5047859, bug# 4987375).
Neither member is inherited in the traditional way from any superclass; all array types extends from Object
directly. This "special treatment" is likely why these bugs exist in the first place.
"does this mean that never will one be able to see the length variable being defined?"
There is no actual source code for array types. Again, these types are special; the JVM just pulls out these types out of a hat whenever they're required. You will not see a .java
source file for the array type int[].class
(i.e. the type of all int
array).
So, no, you will not be able to see the length
field defined.
For further reading, here are some information on Java Reflection: