I think that if I was concerned, I'd build salient versions of Perl on my machine and test them. Actually, that's more or less what I do anyway. My Solaris 10 machine has:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jleffler rd 26 Mar 6 2008 v5.10.0 -> v5.10.0-32bit-multiplicity
drwxr-xr-x 3 jleffler rd 512 Jan 10 2008 v5.10.0-32bit
drwxr-xr-x 6 jleffler rd 512 Mar 7 2008 v5.10.0-32bit-multiplicity
drwxr-xr-x 3 jleffler rd 512 Jan 10 2008 v5.10.0-64bit
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jleffler rd 13 Jan 29 21:07 v5.10.1 -> v5.10.1-64bit
drwxr-xr-x 6 jleffler rd 512 Jan 29 21:43 v5.10.1-64bit
drwxr-xr-x 5 jleffler rd 512 May 6 2003 v5.5.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jleffler RAND 11 Mar 21 2007 v5.6.1 -> v5.6.1-full
drwxr-xr-x 5 jleffler rd 512 May 6 2003 v5.6.1-full
drwxr-xr-x 5 jleffler rd 512 Feb 5 2008 v5.8.7-multi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jleffler rd 19 Mar 24 2007 v5.8.8 -> v5.8.8-32bit-sun-cc
drwxr-xr-x 6 jleffler rd 512 Mar 25 2007 v5.8.8-32bit-sun-cc
drwxr-xr-x 5 jleffler rd 512 Feb 13 2006 v5.8.8-64bit-thread-multi
drwxr-xr-x 3 jleffler rd 512 Mar 20 2008 v5.8.8-gcc-3.4.6
So, that's 5.5.3, 5.6.1, 5.8.7, 5.8.8, 5.10.0 and 5.10.1 installed; I have the source for other versions too:
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 2171936 Apr 12 2001 perl-5.004_04.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 3023320 Aug 31 1999 perl-5.005_03.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 12426022 Dec 18 2007 perl-5.10.0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 11608061 Jan 29 12:32 perl-5.10.1.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 4430438 Mar 29 2000 perl-5.6.0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 4864306 Apr 8 2001 perl-5.6.1.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 5142605 Aug 16 2005 perl-5.6.2.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 8618487 Jul 18 2002 perl-5.8.0.tar.bz2
-rw------- 1 jleffler rd 9410641 Sep 29 2003 perl-5.8.1.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9424944 Nov 5 2003 perl-5.8.2.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9509716 Jan 14 2004 perl-5.8.3.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9598489 Apr 21 2004 perl-5.8.4.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9464689 Jul 19 2004 perl-5.8.5.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9693085 Nov 27 2004 perl-5.8.6.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 9839086 Jun 15 2005 perl-5.8.7.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 10123359 Feb 13 2006 perl-5.8.8.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 jleffler rd 11121414 Dec 14 2008 perl-5.8.9.tar.bz2
@Ether asked:
Do you have a script which will run a particular module, script or unit test against all versions in sequence and collate the results? Such a utility might be really handy as a chrooted/sandboxed CGI.
No, but I haven't needed it. It's basically trivially, though:
for perl in /usr/perl/v5.*.?
do
echo $(basename $perl)
$perl/bin/perl "$@"
done
Basically, for each of the Perl directories in /usr/perl/, run the perl from the bin directory on the given set of arguments. Watch the output...
The difficulty is in deciding what constitutes pass/fail. Obviously, the core of the loop could be:
if $perl/bin/perl "$@" >/dev/null 2>&1
then echo ok $perl
else echo not ok $perl
fi
That's faintly similar to the TAP output. To make it formally equivalent (using bash or Korn shell):
test=0
max=$(ls -d /usr/perl/v5.*.? | wc -l | sed 's/ //g')
echo 1..$max
for perl in /usr/perl/v5.*.?
do
((test = test + 1))
if $perl/bin/perl "$@" >/dev/null 2>&1
then echo ok $test - $perl
else echo not ok $test - $perl
fi
done
Here's an example of running it:
$ ksh test.perl -e 'exit 0'
1..6
ok 1 - /usr/perl/v5.10.0
ok 2 - /usr/perl/v5.10.1
ok 3 - /usr/perl/v5.5.3
ok 4 - /usr/perl/v5.6.1
ok 5 - /usr/perl/v5.8.8
not ok 6 - /usr/perl/v5.8.8-gcc-3.4.6
$
That shows a limitation in shell scripts and their globbing facilities (I'd like to limit the 'star' to a series of digits). The Perl that fails does so because the bin directory doesn't contain a copy of Perl; I needed to save space at some point! It would not be hard to convert the shell script into a Perl script, of course.