Yes, there are differences -- the browser tends to send plenty of additionnal HTTP headers, I'd say ; and the ones that are sent by both probably don't have the same value.
Here, after doing a couple of tests, it seems that passing the HTTP header called Accept
is necessary.
This can be done using the third parameter of file_get_contents
, to specify additionnal context informations :
$opts = array('http' =>
array(
'method' => 'GET',
//'user_agent ' => "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100301 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.6",
'header' => array(
'Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*\/*;q=0.8
'
),
)
);
$context = stream_context_create($opts);
$f = file_get_contents("http://mobile.mybustracker.co.uk/mobile.php?searchMode=2", false, $context);
echo $f;
With this, I'm able to get the HTML code of the page.
Notes :
- I first tested passing the
User-Agent
, but it doesn't seem to be necessary -- which is why the corresponding line is here as a comment
- The value is used for the
Accept
header is the one Firefox used when I requested that page with Firefox before trying with file_get_contents
.
- Some other values might be OK, but I didn't do any test to determine which value is the required one.
For more informations, you can take a look at :