views:

666

answers:

3

Python and Matlab quite often have integer date representations as follows:

733828.0 733829.0 733832.0 733833.0 733834.0 733835.0 733836.0 733839.0 733840.0 733841.0

these numbers correspond to some dates this year. Do you guys know which function can convert them back to YYYYMMDD format?

thanks a million!

+3  A: 

Is 733828.0 a timestamp? If so, you can do the following:

import datetime as dt
dt.date.fromtimestamp(733828.0).strftime('%Y%m%d')

PS

I think Peter Hansen is right :)

I am not a native English speaker. Just trying to help. I don't quite know the difference between a timestamp and an ordinal :(

Satoru.Logic
The question states that those values correspond to "some date this year" so clearly they are not timestamps. The upvotes on this are badly placed...
Peter Hansen
+2  A: 

The datetime.datetime class can help you here. The following works, if those values are treated as integer days (you don't specify what they are).

>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> dt = datetime.fromordinal(733828)
>>> dt
datetime.datetime(2010, 2, 25, 0, 0)
>>> dt.strftime('%Y%m%d')
'20100225'

You show the values as floats, and the above doesn't take floats. If you can give more detail about what the data is (and where it comes from) it will be possible to give a more complete answer.

Peter Hansen
+6  A: 

Since Python example was already demonstrated, here is the matlab one:

>> datestr(733828, 'yyyymmdd')

ans =

20090224

Also, note that while looking similar these are actually different things in Matlab and Python:

Matlab
A serial date number represents the whole and fractional number of days from a specific date and time, where datenum('Jan-1-0000 00:00:00') returns the number 1. (The year 0000 is merely a reference point and is not intended to be interpreted as a real year in time.)

Python, datetime.date.fromordinal
Return the date corresponding to the proleptic Gregorian ordinal, where January 1 of year 1 has ordinal 1.

So they would differ by 366 days, which is apparently the length of the year 0.

SilentGhost
Interesting, if that's the actual output. With Python (see my answer) it appears to be off by one. Obviously a dangerous way to represent dates (at least, without specifying the epoch).
Peter Hansen
What timezone are you in? It may be assuming the stamp is GMT and in the afternoon the date has already changed in Greenwitch.
Martin Beckett
@Peter: by one year and one day, you mean?
SilentGhost
@SilentGhost, yes! I obviously didn't notice the forest for the trees there. So *really* dangerous...
Peter Hansen
@Martin, that's a good thought, but I believe that since Python datetime objects are "naive" about timezones, by default, the values are effectively unaffected by my location relative to Greenwich/UTC. Anyway, SilentGhost's analysis invalidates the "off-by-one" theory.
Peter Hansen
Sorry -misread it that you were off by a day.
Martin Beckett