tags:

views:

158

answers:

4

In ruby, is it possible to specify to call another ruby script using the same ruby interpreter as the original script is being run by?

For example, if a.rb runs b.rb a couple of times, is it possible to replace

system("ruby", "b.rb", "foo", "bar")

with something like

run_ruby("b.rb", "foo", "bar")

so that if you used ruby1.9.1 a.rb on the original, ruby1.9.1 would be used on b.rb, but if you just used ruby a.rb on the original, ruby would be used on b.rb?

I'd prefer not to use shebangs, as I'd like it to be able to run on different computers, some of which don't have /usr/bin/env.

Edit: I didn't mean load or require and the like, but spawning new processes (so I can use multiple CPUs).

+1  A: 
require "b.rb"

will execute the contents of b.rb (you call leave off the ".rb", and there is a search path). In your case, you would probably do something like:

a.rb:

require "b.rb";
b("Hello", "world")

b.rb:

def b(first, second)
  puts first + ", " + second
end

Note that if you use require, Ruby will only load and execute the file once (every time you call load it will be reloaded), but you can call methods defined in the file as many times as you want.

As things get more complex, you will want to move towards an object-oriented design.

EDIT: In that case, you should look into Ruby threading. A simple example is:

a.rb:

require "b";
t1 = Thread.new{b("Hello", "world");}
t2 = Thread.new{b("Hello", "galaxy");}
t1.join
t2.join

b.rb:

def b(first, second)
  10.times {
    puts first + ", " + second;
    sleep(0.1);
  }
end
Matthew Flaschen
That wasn't what I was meaning. Do you understand what I'm after with the edit I've made?
Andrew Grimm
Apart from JRuby, that doesn't allow you to truly use multiple processors.
Andrew Grimm
+3  A: 

Avdi Grimm wrote a series of articles on the Devver blog about different ways to start Ruby subprocesses last summer:

[Note: it appears that part 4 hasn't been published yet.]

Jörg W Mittag
If something as thorough as Avdi's articles has to resort to using `File.join(Config::CONFIG['bindir'], Config::CONFIG['ruby_install_name'])`, it's a good sign there isn't any better alternative!
Andrew Grimm
The blog posts have moved to http://devver.wordpress.com
Andrew Grimm
A: 

The require trick is a good idea, assuming the script in question doesn't choke trying to redefine any constants you may have set, or calling methods on objects you may have runtime monkey patched to no longer honor their standard contracts.

In either case, the problem is less the approach than it is the code in the scripts themselves. Show good manners, put your constants in a namespace, and don't monkey patch the runtime desctructively.

To ensure the script in question doesn't mess with the runtime of your calling script, and to guard against the chance it might call Kernel/Process.exit() somewhere, try the following

pid=Process.fork do
    require 'script.rb'
    Process.exit
end
ignored, status = Process.waitpid2(pid, Process::WNOHANG)
puts "script.rb PID #{pid} exited, exit status: #{status.exitstatus}" 

For more advanced things like writing to its stdin stream or reading from its stdout or stderr streams, use the Open4 gem.

mlwelles