views:

87

answers:

1

I have seen the following methods to be used in several online examples, but haven't found any documentation on the recommended way of parsing an XML feed.

Method 1:

protected function xmlResponseHandler(event:ResultEvent):void
{
    var atom:Namespace = new Namespace("http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom");
    var microsoftData:Namespace = new Namespace("http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices");
    var microsoftMetadata:Namespace = new   Namespace("http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata");

    var ac:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
    var keyValuePairs:KeyValuePair;
    var propertyList:XMLList = (event.result as XML)..atom::entry.atom::content.microsoftMetadata::properties;

    for each (var properties:XML in propertyList)
    {
        keyValuePairs = new KeyValuePair(properties.microsoftData::FieldLocation, properties.microsoftData::Locationid);
        ac.addItem(keyValuePairs);     
    } 

    cb.dataProvider = ac;
}

Method 2:

protected function xmlResponseHandler(event:ResultEvent):void
{
    namespace atom = "http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom";
    namespace d = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices";
    namespace m = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata";

    use namespace d;
    use namespace m;
    use namespace atom;

    var ac:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
    var keyValuePairs:KeyValuePair;
    var propertyList:XMLList = (event.result as XML)..entry.content.properties;

    for each (var properties:XML in propertyList)
    {
        keyValuePairs = new KeyValuePair(properties.FieldLocation, properties.Locationid);
        ac.addItem(keyValuePairs);     
    } 

    cb.dataProvider = ac;
}  

Method 3:

protected function xmlResponseHandler(event:ResultEvent):void
{
    var ac:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
    var keyValuePairs:KeyValuePair;
    var propertyList:XMLList = (event.result as XML)..*::entry.*::content.*::properties;

    for each (var properties:XML in propertyList)
    {
        keyValuePairs = new KeyValuePair(properties.*::FieldLocation, properties.*::Locationid);
        ac.addItem(keyValuePairs);     
    } 

    cb.dataProvider = ac;
}  

Sample XML feed:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="yes"?>
<feed xml:base="http://www.test.com/Test/my.svc/" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"&gt;
    <title type="text">Test_Locations</title>
    <id>http://www.test.com/test/my.svc/Test_Locations&lt;/id&gt;
    <updated>2010-04-27T20:41:23Z</updated>
    <link rel="self" title="Test_Locations" href="Test_Locations" />
    <entry>
        <id>1</id>
        <title type="text"></title>
        <updated>2010-04-27T20:41:23Z</updated>
        <author>
            <name />
        </author>
        <link rel="edit" title="Test_Locations" href="http://www.test.com/id=1" />
        <category term="MySQLModel.Test_Locations" scheme="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/scheme" />
        <content type="application/xml">
            <m:properties>
                <d:FieldLocation>Test Location</d:FieldLocation>
                <d:Locationid>test0129</d:Locationid>
            </m:properties>
        </content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <id>2</id>
        <title type="text"></title>
        <updated>2010-04-27T20:41:23Z</updated>
        <author>
            <name />
        </author>
        <link rel="edit" title="Test_Locations" href="http://www.test.com/id=2" />
        <category term="MySQLModel.Test_Locations" scheme="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/scheme" />
        <content type="application/xml">
            <m:properties>
                <d:FieldLocation>Yet Another Test Location</d:FieldLocation>
                <d:Locationid>test25</d:Locationid>
            </m:properties>
        </content>
    </entry>
</feed>
+1  A: 

Third one totally defeats the purpose of having namespaces by ignoring them. So that's a no.

Out of the first two methods, though it might lead to a couple of extra keystrokes, I would prefer the first one as it explicitly states which namespace each identifier refers to.

I must also add that the second method is new to me - haven't come across that yet.

Amarghosh