tags:

views:

91

answers:

3

so far i was doing it like this:

<a href="http://domain.com" title="Keyword"><img src="image.png" alt="Keyword" /></a>

Now, i discovered that images can have title attribute too:

<a href="http://domain.com" title="Keyword"><img src="image.png" alt="Keyword" title="Keyword"/></a>

Is there any other optimization i could pull off to boost image links value?

+3  A: 

I would have to say yes, the title tag would add value to your SEO. Check this link for full details - http://www.seocentral.com/tutorials/alt-title-attributes.html

JL
+5  A: 

I think that's the best you can do really, someone told me to try and make image names as descriptive as possible, for instance:

image_001.jpg --> honda_accord_2009.jpg

Granted image.png is just an example, but it might apply.

That's all I could think of.

ILMV
+4  A: 

Think of the alt attribute as an alternative text replacement for the image. Imagine for a moment that you had to describe the image to someone who could not see it. That is the sort of information you should be conveying in the alt attribute.

Similar to the alt attribute, title is used for the same purpose. It helps to convey extra information about an element. You can apply the title attribute to most elements but you must give all your images an alt attribute.

In my opinion, having both an alt and a title on an image is redundant, especially if they are conveying the same information.

greenie
greenie, dont you thing those attributes are the extra space for targedet keywords even thought they're considered to be used as description method. For instance, if i had a client, say a insurance company i would put it this way: <a href="http://www.realinsurance.com.au/" title="Life Insurance - Real Insurance"><img src="logo.png" alt="Life Insurance - Real Insurance" title="Real Insurance Logo" /></a> would that method be good solution?
purpler
Sort of along the right lines yes. The "Life Insurance - Real Insurance" title on the link is good because you are describing what the site is that you are linking to. I'd then consider removing the title attribute from the image element because firstly, you're just repeating what alt says and secondly, you already have the same title on the link. As that link is surrounding the image, web crawlers would probably see the two as related items.
greenie
And in response to the first part of your reply, no I don't consider alt and title places to put keywords. I don't believe that web crawlers look for keywords the same way they used to in the early days of the web. These days I think they are much more semantic and look for the meanings in phrases and sentences. You should focus on writing as descriptively as possible without writing extensively.
greenie