I am not sure if the following is either sufficiently complicated or excessively complicated.
It basically boils down to an interrelated class and interface. (See below) Suggestions appreciated....
/**
* @param <T> item type
* @param <TF> table format type
*/
interface EnumTableFormatItem<T, TF extends TableFormat<T>> {
Object getValue(TF context, T item);
String getLabel();
}
/**
* @param <T> item type
* @param <E> enum type which specifies each column
*/
static public class EnumTableFormat
<
T,
E extends Enum<E>
& EnumTableFormatItem<T, EnumTableFormat<T, E>>
> implements TableFormat<T>
{
final private List<E> fields = new ArrayList<E>();
public EnumTableFormat(List<E> fieldList) { this.fields.addAll(fieldList); }
@Override public int getColumnCount() { return this.fields.size(); }
@Override public String getColumnName(int column) {
return this.fields.get(column).getLabel();
}
@Override public Object getColumnValue(T item, int column) {
return this.fields.get(column).getValue(this, item);
}
}
edit: On a quick reflection, it seems excessively complicated, I just wanted to use an object for context & I think I shouldn't have coupled it to the EnumTableFormat.
/**
* @param <T> item type
* @param <C> context object type
*/
public interface EnumTableFormatItem<T, C> {
Object getValue(C context, T item);
String getLabel();
}
/**
* @param <T> item type
* @param <C> context object type
* @param <E> enum type which specifies each column
*/
static public class EnumTableFormat
<
T, C,
E extends Enum<E>
& EnumTableFormatItem<T, C>
> implements TableFormat<T>
{
final private List<E> fields = new ArrayList<E>();
final private C context;
public EnumTableFormat(C context, List<E> fieldList) {
this.fields.addAll(fieldList);
this.context = context;
}
@Override public int getColumnCount() { return this.fields.size(); }
@Override public String getColumnName(int column) {
return this.fields.get(column).getLabel();
}
@Override public Object getColumnValue(T item, int column) {
return this.fields.get(column).getValue(this.context, item);
}
}