views:

217

answers:

4

Hello Guys,

in Scala, I can make a caseclass case class Foo(x:Int) and then put it in a list like so:

List(Foo(42))

Now, nothing strange here. The following is strange to me. The operator :: is a function on a list, right? With any function with 1 argument in Scala, I can call it with infix notation. An example is 1 + 2 is a function (+) on the object Int. The class Foo I just defined does not have the :: operator, so how is the following possible:

Foo(40) :: List(Foo(2))

?

In scala 2.8 rc1, I get the following output from the interactive prompt:

scala> case class Foo(x:Int)
defined class Foo

scala> Foo(40) :: List(Foo(2))
res2: List[Foo] = List(Foo(40), Foo(2))

scala> 

I can go on and use it, but if someone can explain it I will be glad :)

+7  A: 

It ends with a :. And that is the sign, that this function is defined in the class to the right (in List class here).

So, it's List(Foo(2)).::(Foo(40)), not Foo(40).::(List(Foo(2))) in your example.

folone
In other words, `a ::::: b` (just to be silly) is the same as `b.:::::(a)`. Additionally, methods whose names end in colon and used in infix style associate to the right, rather than to the left, so `a :: b :: c` is the same as `c.::(b.::(a)))`
Randall Schulz
@Randall Thank you, I updated my answer in accordance with your comment.
folone
+11  A: 

From the Spec:

6.12.3 InfixOperations An infix operator can be an arbitrary identifier. Infix operators have precedence and associativity defined as follows.

...

The associativity of an operator is determined by the operator’s last character. Operators ending in a colon ‘:’ are right-associative. All other operators are left- associative.

You can always see how these rules are applied in Scala by printing the program after it has been through the 'typer' phase of the compiler:

scala -Xprint:typer -e "1 :: Nil"

val r: List[Int] = {
  <synthetic> val x$1: Int = 1;
  immutable.this.Nil.::[Int](x$1)
};
retronym
+3  A: 

The class Foo I just defined does not have the :: operator, so how is the following possible:

Foo(40) :: List(Foo(2))

If the method name ends in a colon (:) the method is invoked on the right operand, which is the case here. If the method name doesn't end with colon the method is invoked on the left operand -- e.g: a + b, "+" is invoked on "a".

So in your example "::" is a method on its right operand, which is a List.

Surya Suravarapu
+2  A: 

One aspect missing in the answers given is that to support :: in pattern matching expressions:

List(1,2) match {
  case x :: xs => println(x + " " + xs)
  case _ => println("")
}

A class :: is defined :

final case class ::[B](private var hd: B, private[scala] var tl: List[B]) 

so case ::(x,xs) would produce the same result. The expression case x :: xs works because the default extractor :: is defined for the case class and it can be used infix.

Thomas Jung
Thanks for the addition, that is very helpful :)
Felix