In WF 3.5 we used ManualWorkflowScheduler service to host workflows in Asp.Net. What is the equivalent way of doing this in WF4? Are new classed like WorkflowServiceHost or WorkflowApplication suitable to use in Asp.Net?
+1
A:
Using the WorkflowServiceHost works just fine in an ASP.NET application. There is no way to mimic the ManualWorkflowScheduler behavior where you can run a workflow until it is idle though, all hosts with the exception of the WorkflowInvoker are always asynchronous.
Maurice
2010-05-14 15:10:46
Any code samples (or links) on WF 4.0 hosted/integrated in ASP.NET (we cant use AppFabric), should we use WCF or bookmarks for communication between ASP.NET host and WF?
Binoj Antony
2010-06-09 08:14:33