For regular C strings, a NULL signifies the end of data.
What about std::string, can I have a string with embedded NULLS?
For regular C strings, a NULL signifies the end of data.
What about std::string, can I have a string with embedded NULLS?
Yep this is valid.
You can have a null character in the middle of the string.
However, if you use a std::string with a null character in the middle with a c string function your in undefined behaviour town - and nobody wants to be there!!!:
int n = strlen( strWithNullInMiddle.c_str() ); // Boom!!!
Yes you can have embedded nulls in your std::string
.
Example:
std::string s;
s.push_back('\0');
s.push_back('a');
assert(s.length() == 2);
Note: std::string
's c_str()
member will always append a null character to the returned char buffer; However, std::string
's data()
member may or may not append a null character to the returned char buffer.
Be careful of operator+=
One thing to look out for is to not use operator+=
with a char*
on the RHS. It will only add up until the null character.
For example:
std::string s = "hello";
s += "\0world";
assert(s.length() == 5);
The correct way:
std::string s = "hello";
s += std::string("\0world", 6);
assert(s.length() == 11);
Storing binary data more common to use std::vector
Generally it's more common to use std::vector
to store arbitrary binary data.
std::vector<char> buf;
buf.resize(1024);
char *p = &buf.front();
It is probably more common since std::string
's data()
and c_str()
members return const pointers so the memory is not modifiable. with &buf.front() you are free to modify the contents of the buffer directly.
Yes. A std::string is just a vector<char>
with benefits.
However, be careful about passing such a beast to something that calls .c_str()
and stops at the 0.
You can, but why would you want to? Embedding NUL in an std::string is just asking for trouble, because functions to which you pass an std::string may very well use it's c_str() member, and most will assume that the first NUL indicates the end of the string. Hence this is not a good idea to do. Also note that in UTF-8, only '\0' will result in a 0, so even for i18n purposes, there is no justification for embedding NULs.