tags:

views:

75

answers:

2

I ran across something once upon a time and wondered if it was a Python "bug" or at least a misfeature. I'm curious if anyone knows of any justifications for this behavior. I thought of it just now reading "Code Like a Pythonista," which has been enjoyable so far. I'm only familiar with the 2.x line of Python.

Raw strings are strings that are prefixed with an r. This is great because I can use backslashes in regular expressions and I don't need to double everything everywhere. It's also handy for writing throwaway scripts on Windows, so I can use backslashes there also. (I know I can also use forward slashes, but throwaway scripts often contain content cut&pasted from elsewhere in Windows.)

So great! Unless, of course, you really want your string to end with a backslash. There's no way to do that in a 'raw' string.

In [9]: r'\n'
Out[9]: '\\n'

In [10]: r'abc\n'
Out[10]: 'abc\\n'

In [11]: r'abc\'
------------------------------------------------
   File "<ipython console>", line 1
     r'abc\'
           ^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal


In [12]: r'abc\\'
Out[12]: 'abc\\\\'

So one slash before the closing quote is an error, but two slashes gives you two slashes! Certainly I'm not the only one that is bothered by this?

Thoughts on why 'raw' strings are 'raw, except for slash-quote'? I mean, if I wanted to embed a single quote in there I'd just use double quotes around the string, and vice versa. If I wanted both, I'd just triple quote. If I really wanted three quotes in a row in a raw string, well, I guess I'd have to deal, but is this considered "proper behavior"?

+5  A: 

It's a FAQ.

And in response to "you really want your string to end with a backslash. There's no way to do that in a 'raw' string.": the FAQ shows how to workaround it.

>>> r'ab\c' '\\' == 'ab\\c\\'
True
>>>
John Machin
Certainly seems like a misfeature.
DS
@DS: Your suggested alternative design for raw strings is ...?
John Machin
Didn't know it was a FAQ, but probably should have assumed as much. ;) Not speaking for @DS, but my alternative design is "no escape processing." You know, kinda like what it says on the tin?
dash-tom-bang
+3  A: 

Raw strings are meant mostly for readably writing the patterns for regular expressions, which never need a trailing backslash; it's an accident that they may come in handy for Windows (where you could use forward slashes in most cases anyway -- the Microsoft C library which underlies Python accepts either form!). It's not cosidered acceptable to make it (nearly) impossible to write a regular expression pattern containing both single and double quotes, just to reinforce the accident in question.

("Nearly" because triple-quoting would almost alway help... but it could be a little bit of a pain sometimes).

So, yes, raw strings were designed to behave that way (forbidding odd numbers of trailing backslashes), and it is considered perfectly "proper behavior" for them to respect the design decisions Guido made when he invented them;-).

Alex Martelli
Yes- I addressed the reason why I'm using back slashes in my OP. Thanks though; my point was exactly that triple quoting would get over any problem with using quote characters in regular expressions. Indeed, I've wanted to have a trailing backslash but never a regexp with several different types of quote characters.
dash-tom-bang