The following code displays correctly in Chrome or IE (the image is 200px wide). In Firefox and Opera the max-width style is ignored completely. Why does this happen and is there a good work around? Also, which way is most standards compliant?
Note
One possible work around for this particular situation is to set max-width to 200px. However, this is a rather contrived example. I'm looking for a strategy for a variable width container.
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
div { display: table-cell; padding: 15px; width: 200px; }
div img { max-width: 100%; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3352/4644534211_b9c887b979.jpg" />
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec facilisis
ante, facilisis posuere ligula feugiat ut. Fusce hendrerit vehicula congue.
at ligula dolor. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
leo metus, aliquam eget convallis eget, molestie at massa.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
[Update]
As stated by mVChr below, the w3.org spec states that max-width does not apply to inline elements. I've tried using div img { max-width: 100%; display: block; }, but it does not seem to correct the issue.
[Update]
I still have no solution for this issue. However, I am using the following javascript hack to fix my problems. Essentially, it recreates the situation above and checks if the browser supports max-width within display: table-cell. (Using a data uri prevents an extra http request. The one below is a 3x3 bmp.)
jQuery( function ( $ ) {
var img = $( "<img style='max-width:100%' src='" +
"" +
"AMAAAABAAEAAAAAAAwAAADEDgAAxA4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP//" +
"/wAAAAAAwAAAAKAAAAA%3D" +
"'>" )
.appendTo(
$( "<div style='display:table-cell;width:1px;'></div>" )
.appendTo( "body" )
);
$.support.tableCellMaxWidth = img.width() == 1;
img.parent().remove();
});