tags:

views:

199

answers:

4

Hello,

A multidimensional list like l=[[1,2],[3,4]] could be converted to a 1D one by doing sum(l,[]). Can anybody please explain how that happens?

Thanks,
Sayan

+6  A: 

sum adds a sequence together using the + operator. e.g sum([1,2,3]) == 6. The 2nd parameter is an optional start value which defaults to 0. e.g. sum([1,2,3], 10) == 16.

In your example it does [] + [1,2] + [3,4] where + on 2 lists concatenates them together. Therefore the result is [1,2,3,4]

The empty list is required as the 2nd paramter to sum because, as mentioned above, the default is for sum to add to 0 (i.e. 0 + [1,2] + [3,4]) which would result in unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'list'

This is the relevant section of the help for sum:

sum(sequence[, start]) -> value

Returns the sum of a sequence of numbers (NOT strings) plus the value of parameter 'start' (which defaults to 0).

Note

As wallacoloo comented this is not a general solution for flattening any multi dimensional list. It just works for a list of 1D lists due to the behavior described above.

Update

For a way to flatten 1 level of nesting see this recipe from the itertools page:

def flatten(listOfLists):
    "Flatten one level of nesting"
    return chain.from_iterable(listOfLists)

To flatten more deeply nested lists (including irregularly nested lists) see the accepted answer to this question (there are also some other questions linked to from that question itself.)

Note that the recipe returns an itertools.chain object (which is iterable) and the other question's answer returns a generator object so you need to wrap either of these in a call to list if you want the full list rather than iterating over it. e.g. list(flatten(my_list_of_lists)).

mikej
Many thanks, understood. May I ask that what is the shortest and best way to flatten a list? At present I can only think of running two nested for loops or a recursive function to do that.
Sayan
I've done a quick update to the answer with a recipe for flattening 1 level of nesting and a link to a previous SO question with a more general solution.
mikej
A: 

It looks to me more like you're looking for a final answer of:

[3, 7]

For that you're best off with a list comprehension

>>> l=[[1,2],[3,4]]
>>> [x+y for x,y in l]
[3, 7]
Adam Nelson
No not really, I was trying to find a shorter/better alternative to flatten a 2D list. I am populating a list containing triplets to another list (like [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]), and I would not enter a number if it is already existing in that list. So my aim is to put something like <num not in [code that flattens a list]>...Thanks anyway :)
Sayan
@Sayan Then you don't want lists, you want `set`s.
badp
Hitherto I knew nothing about Python sets. Thanks for the direction.
Sayan
+1  A: 

If your list nested is, as you say, "2D" (meaning that you only want to go one level down, and all 1-level-down items of nested are lists), a simple list comprehension:

flat = [x for sublist in nested for x in sublist]

is the approach I'd recommend -- much more efficient than summing would be (sum is intended for numbers -- it was just too much of a bother to somehow make it block all attempts to "sum" non-numbers... I was the original proposer and first implementer of sum in the Python standard library, so I guess I should know;-).

If you want to go down "as deep as it takes" (for deeply nested lists), recursion is the simplest way, although by eliminating the recursion you can get higher performance (at the price of higher complication).

This recipe suggests a recursive solution, a recursion elimination, and other approaches (all instructive, though none as simple as the one-liner I suggested earlier in this answer).

Alex Martelli
Ah I was sure I could do it using list comprehension but was messing up with the code. Thanks and a privilege!
Sayan
A: 

I wrote a program to do multi-dimensional flattening using recursion. If anyone has comments on making the program better, you can always see me smiling:

def flatten(l):
    lf=[]
    li=[]
    ll=[]
    p=0
    for i in l:
        if type(i).__name__=='list':
           li.append(i)
        else:
           lf.append(i)
    ll=[x for i in li for x in i]
    lf.extend(ll)

    for i in lf:
        if type(i).__name__ =='list':
           #not completely flattened
           flatten(lf)
        else:
           p=p+1
           continue

    if p==len(lf):
       print(lf)
Sayan