views:

241

answers:

2

obviously bzr clone, bzr branch and bzr checkout all do the same thing when given an URL as parameter and executed in a non-bzr directory.

is there any difference for later bazaar workflow? i.e. bzr commit, bzr update and friends.

+2  A: 

bzr branch and bzr checkout do very different things. They both give you a working tree, but bzr checkout gives you only a working tree; commits and updates work directly on/from the source repository. bzr branch gives you a working tree of a new branch of the repository; commits on this branch will not be automatically applied to the source branch. I'm not sure on clone.

Michael E
+3  A: 

Branching and cloning are the same, but branching and checkouts are not the same.

$ bzr help branch
...
Aliases:  get, clone
See also: checkout

Looking over the Checkout Tutorial, you'll see that a checkout essentially binds every action you take directly to the branch. So anything you do is essentially pushed when you do it -- obviously that's a huge workflow difference.

Difference between a Branch and a Checkout

Let's start by saying there is nothing you can do with a Checkout that you can't do with plain Branches. A Checkout just enables different defaults and workflow helpers.

What does Checkout do

With a Checkout, whenever you create new entries in a local Branch, it also creates them in a remote Branch. This corresponds to commands like bzr commit and bzr pull. If you attempt to commit a new changes, and the remote Branch has a different state than the local one, it will prevent you, and let you know that you are out of date. You can use bzr update to apply the remote changes locally.

Mark Rushakoff
so checkout switches bzr to a svn-like mode, losing all the benefits of distributed version control
knittl
@knittl: not all, because you can still make another branch of your checkout, for example... And one strong point of Bazaar is that it offers a variety of workflows, the checkout one might reassure people coming from centralized VCSes.
PhiLho