views:

339

answers:

4

I need to compute combinatorials (nCr) in Python but cannot find the function to do that in 'math', 'numyp' or 'stat' libraries. Something like a function of the type:

comb = calculate_combinations(n, r)

I need the number of possible combinations, not the actual combinations, so itertools.combinations does not interest me.

Finally, I want to avoid using factorials, as the numbers I'll be calculating the combinations for can get to big and the factorials are going to be monstruous.

This seems like a REALLY easy to answer question, however I am being drowned in questions about generating all the actual combinations, which is not what I want. :)

Many thanks

+6  A: 

See scipy.misc.comb. Unless exact answers are requested, it uses the gammaln function to obtain good precision without taking much time. In the exact case it returns a Python long, which might take long to compute.

Jouni K. Seppänen
+1, I was looking for something like that but you beat me to finding it ;-)
David Zaslavsky
Many thanks. You save me some searching time :)
Morlock
+2  A: 

A quick search on google code gives (it uses formula from @Mark Byers's answer):

def choose(n, k):
    """
    A fast way to calculate binomial coefficients by Andrew Dalke (contrib).
    """
    if 0 <= k <= n:
        ntok = 1
        ktok = 1
        for t in xrange(1, min(k, n - k) + 1):
            ntok *= n
            ktok *= t
            n -= 1
        return ntok // ktok
    else:
        return 0

choose() is 10 times faster (tested on all 0 <= (n,k) < 1e3 pairs) than scipy.misc.comb() if you need an exact answer.

def comb(N,k): # from scipy.comb(), but MODIFIED!
    if (k > N) or (N < 0) or (k < 0):
        return 0L
    N,k = map(long,(N,k))
    top = N
    val = 1L
    while (top > (N-k)):
        val *= top
        top -= 1
    n = 1L
    while (n < k+1L):
        val /= n
        n += 1
    return val
J.F. Sebastian
+1  A: 

If you want exact results and speed, try gmpy -- gmpy.comb should do exactly what you ask for, and it's pretty fast (of course, as gmpy's original author, I am biased;-).

Alex Martelli
Indeed, `gmpy2.comb()` is 10 times faster than `choose()` from my answer for the code: `for k, n in itertools.combinations(range(1000), 2): f(n,k)` where `f()` is either `gmpy2.comb()` or `choose()` on Python 3.
J.F. Sebastian
A: 

Why not write it yourself? It's a one-liner or such:

from operator import mul    # or mul=lambda x,y:x*y

nCk = lambda n,k: int(round(
    reduce(mul, (float(n-i)/(i+1) for i in range(k)), 1)
))

Test - printing Pascal's triangle:

>>> for n in range(17):
...     print ' '.join('%5d'%nCk(n,k) for k in range(n+1)).center(100)
...     
                                                   1                                                
                                                1     1                                             
                                             1     2     1                                          
                                          1     3     3     1                                       
                                       1     4     6     4     1                                    
                                    1     5    10    10     5     1                                 
                                 1     6    15    20    15     6     1                              
                              1     7    21    35    35    21     7     1                           
                           1     8    28    56    70    56    28     8     1                        
                        1     9    36    84   126   126    84    36     9     1                     
                     1    10    45   120   210   252   210   120    45    10     1                  
                  1    11    55   165   330   462   462   330   165    55    11     1               
               1    12    66   220   495   792   924   792   495   220    66    12     1            
            1    13    78   286   715  1287  1716  1716  1287   715   286    78    13     1         
         1    14    91   364  1001  2002  3003  3432  3003  2002  1001   364    91    14     1      
      1    15   105   455  1365  3003  5005  6435  6435  5005  3003  1365   455   105    15     1   
    1    16   120   560  1820  4368  8008 11440 12870 11440  8008  4368  1820   560   120    16     1
>>> 
Nas Banov