The literal answer is no - there is never anything "inherently wrong" with code, it's a matter of whether it meets the requirements - which may or may not include being maintainable, secure, robust or fast.
The code you are running is actually a JET query purely within Access - the Java code is doing nothing except telling Access to run the query.
On the one hand, if it ain't broke don't fix it. On the other hand, there's a good chance it will break in the near future so you could try fixing it in advance.
The two likely reasons it might break are:
- SQL injection risk. Depending on where csvDirPath and csvFileName come from (e.g. csvFileName might come from the name of the file uploaded by a user?), and on how clever the Access JDBC driver is, you could be open to someone breaking or deleting your data by inserting a semicolon (or some brackets to make a subquery) and some additional SQL commands into the query.
- You are relying on the columns of the CSV file being compatible with the columns of the Access table. If you have unchecked CSV being uploaded, or if the CSV generator has a particular way of handling nulls, or if you one day get an unusual date or number format, you may get an error on inserting into the Access table.
Having said all that, we are all about pragmatism here. If the above code is from a utility class which you are going to use by hand a few times a week/month/year/ever, then it isn't really a problem.
If it is a class which forms part of a web application, then the 'official' Java way to do it would be to read records out of the CSV file (either using a CSV parser or a CSV/text JDBC driver), get the columns out of the recordset, do some validation or sanity checking on them, and then use a new PreparedStatement to insert them into the Access database. Much more trouble but much more robust.
You can probably find a combination of tools (e.g. object-relational layers or other data access tools) which will do a lot of that for you, but setting up the tools is going to be as much hassle as writing the code. Then again, you'll learn a lot from either one.