See: Conversions and promotions
According to that, your int
is promoted to long
and then is evaluated.
Same happens with, for instance, int
+ double
and the rest of the primitives. ie.
System.out( 1 + 2.0 );// prints 3.0 a double
As for the addition operator I'm pretty much it is the same, but I don't have any reference of it.
A quick view to the compiler's source reveals they are different.
Namely iadd
for int addition and ladd
for long addition:
See this sample code:
$cat Addition.java
public class Addition {
public static void main( String [] args ) {
int a = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
long b = Long.parseLong(args[0]);
// int addition
int c = a + a;
// long addition
long d = a + b;
}
}
$javac Addition.java
$
When compiled the byte code generated is this:
$javap -c Addition
Compiled from "Addition.java"
public class Addition extends java.lang.Object{
public Addition();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #1; //Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: return
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
0: aload_0
1: iconst_0
2: aaload
3: invokestatic #2; //Method java/lang/Integer.parseInt:(Ljava/lang/String;)I
6: istore_1
7: aload_0
8: iconst_0
9: aaload
10: invokestatic #3; //Method java/lang/Long.parseLong:(Ljava/lang/String;)J
13: lstore_2
14: iload_1
15: iload_1
16: iadd
17: istore 4
19: iload_1
20: i2l
21: lload_2
22: ladd
23: lstore 5
25: return
}
Look at line 16
it says: iadd
( for int addition ) while the line 22
says ladd
( for long addition )
Also, is it safe to perform arithmetic with different primitives so long as you are assigning into a variable of the widest primitive type in your expression?
Yes, and it's also "safe" to perform arithmetic with smaller sizes, in the sense, they don't break the program, you just lose information.
For instance, try adding Integer.MAX_VALUE to Integer.MAX_VALUE
to see what happens, or int x = ( int ) ( Long.MAX_VALUE - 1 );