views:

62

answers:

4

I want to validate and parse dates using a simpleDateFormat with the format "yyyymmdd" This also allows 100624, which is parsed to the year 10 (54 years after Julius Ceasar died). The dates will also be something like 1970, so I don't want to settle with SimpleDateFornat("yymmdd").

I'm wondering is there a way to force a four digit year format using the SimpleDateFormat? I'm close to do a regexp test upfront but maybe there is a smart way to use the (Simple)DateFormat()?

As requested the code, things are getting more complicate and my research was half. The Format used was yyyy-MM-dd to start with (it came from a variable, which had a wrong javadoc). However as indicated in an answer below yyyyMMdd does force a four year digit. So my question is changed to How to force a four digit year for the "yyyy-MM-dd" format. And why does "yyyyMMdd" behave different?

    public void testMaturity() {
    try {
        SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
        sdf.setLenient(false);
        System.out.println(" " + sdf.format(sdf.parse("40-12-14")));
        SimpleDateFormat sdf2 = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMdd");
        sdf.setLenient(false);
        System.out.println(" " + sdf2.format(sdf2.parse("401214")));
        fail();
    } catch (ParseException pe) {
        assertTrue(true);
    }

Which prints 0040-12-14

+2  A: 

Simply use yyyyMMdd (note: upper case M is used to indicate month, otherwise you're parsing minutes!) and then check if the year is greater some cutoff date (for example, when parsing birth dates, greater 1800 is a safe bet, when parsing dates for upcomming dates greater than or equal the current year would be good).

Joachim Sauer
+1  A: 

Hmm. I suspect you should be using "MM" instead of "mm" to start with... but "100624" doesn't parse anyway when I try it - even in lenient mode:

import java.util.*;
import java.text.*;

public class Test
{
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
    {
        SimpleDateFormat format = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMdd");
        format.setLenient(true);
        tryParse(format, "100624");
        format.setLenient(false);
        tryParse(format, "100624");
    }

    static void tryParse(DateFormat format, String text)
    {
        try
        {
            Date date = format.parse(text);
            System.out.println("Parsed " + text + " to " + date);
        }
        catch (ParseException pe)
        {
            System.out.println("Failed to parse " + text);
        }
    }
}

(And even using "mm" instead of "MM" it still fails to parse.)

Prints:

Failed to parse 100624
Failed to parse 100624

Perhaps you could show the code which is managing to parse this?

Jon Skeet
Thanks! I added some code to test, and found out that the formatString was not as what was expected and that yyyyMMdd indeed forces a 4 digit year requirement. Remains typical that yyyy-MM-dd behaves different.
dr jerry
A: 

Try calling setLenient(false); on the SimpleDateFormat object - that will make it use more strict rules for parsing (otherwise it will try to be "smart" if the input string doesn't exactly match the format). For example:

DateFormat df = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMdd");
df.setLenient(false);

And ofcourse, months is MM, not mm.

Jesper
A: 

There is no easy way for this. If you're saying that dates can be like 1970 the main question would be what 700624 means - 1970 or 2070? You should either implement some cutoff date like Joachim proposed or move entirely to 4 digits year.

Maciej Dragan