tags:

views:

99

answers:

3

Question: Where does p get it's value from below and why does it happen?

Consider this irb session:

me@somewhere:~$ irb
irb(main):001:0> a
NameError: undefined local variable or method `a' for main:Object
    from (irb):1
irb(main):002:0> foo
NameError: undefined local variable or method `foo' for main:Object
    from (irb):2
irb(main):003:0> p
=> nil
irb(main):004:0> p.class
=> NilClass
irb(main):005:0>

I never defined p - so why is it nil valued? Neither a nor foo were recognized so what's special about p? I also didn't find anything listed under Kernel#p

Context: I'm reading the so-called "28 bytes of ruby joy" and assumed p was a variable, as in: def p.method_missing *_ ...

(Don't worry: I'm not going to actually define method_missing on nil everywhere... just studying some ruby code...)

+2  A: 

p is a method which prints the inspect value of its arguments and returns nil. Without arguments it simply does nothing.

Its documentation is under Kernel#p, not Kernel::p (because it's an instance method of Kernel).

sepp2k
+2  A: 

p is a method of the Kernel module. It's good for debugging - it prints out the internal representation of whatever you give it, by calling inspect on it. If you don't pass it any arguments, it just prints out nil.

irb(main):001:0> p 11
11
=> 11
irb(main):002:0> Kernel::p [1,2] + [3,4]
[1, 2, 3, 4]
=> [1, 2, 3, 4]

The results are printed out twice here as it also returns the object, which irb then prints out too.

cytzol
It actually prints nothing if given no arguments. `nil` is it's return value. http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Kernel.html#M005961
glenn jackman
+6  A: 

p is just a method on Kernel which calls inspect on its arguments, producing human-readable representations of those objects. If you give it no arguments, it prints nothing. Regardless of what you pass it, though, it returns nil. See Kernel#p and Object#inspect.

Power tip: In Ruby 1.9, when you have a method and you don't know where it came from, use the method method:

ruby-1.9.1-p378 > method(:p)
 => #<Method: Object(Kernel)#p>

Putting it together one step at a time, we read this as:

 p                            # We found a method called p.
 #p                           # It's an instance method.
 Object ... #p                # It's available on Object.
 Object(Kernel)#p             # It came from the Kernel module.

Update: The OP provided some context from this article, where the author claims that your life will be easier if you add a method_missing to nil, by doing the following:

def p.method_missing*_;p;end

This somewhat obfuscated code should be read as:

  • Define a new method (def), called method_missing. This overrides the default method_missing handler on Object, which simply raises a NoMethodError when it encounters a method it doesn't understand.
  • This method will live on something called p.
  • It accepts any number of arguments (*) and stores them in a variable called _.
  • The result of these arguments is something called p.

The second bullet is the tricky part here. def p.method_missing means one of two things, depending on context:

  • A previously defined object called p which is in scope here.
  • A method called p which is in scope, and which is passed no arguments.

With def p.method_missing, we mean, "this method is being defined on the object which is the result of calling p with no arguments". In this case, that is NilClass; if you call p with no arguments, you get nil. So this is just a short, hacky way to define a method on NilClass.

Note: I definitely recommend against defining a method_missing on nil. This is a silly and dangerous tactic to use for the sake of saving a few lines of code, because it changes the behavior of nil. Don't do it!

John Feminella
I Agree: I think the 28 bytes approach is interesting from a design point of view but it's dangerous to change such a global assumption given __other people might be relying on exceptions caused by messaging nil__. (It's from the "oh no! - they've discovered meta-programming" school of maintenance problems...)
cartoonfox