Folks,
I am running given below query in two different server which has different versions of postgresql which gives strange results.
select distinct "D","E","A","B","F","C","G","H","I","J","K","L" from ABC where "L"=1 group by "D","E","A","B","F","C","G","H","I","L" order by "A", "B", "C";
Server1: db details->PostgreSQL 8.3.9 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc-4.3.real (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2 EXPLAIN OUTPUT OF QUERY:
Unique (cost=16618.27..16884.84 rows=8202 width=71)
Sort (cost=16618.27..16638.78 rows=8202 width=71)
Sort Key: "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F","G", "H", "I", J, K
GroupAggregate (cost=13296.68..16085.07 rows=8202 width=71)
Sort (cost=13296.68..13501.71 rows=82011 width=71)
Sort Key: "A", "B", ""C"", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "L"
Seq Scan on exims (cost=0.00..3236.14 rows=82011 width=71)
Filter: ("L" = 1)
Server2: db details->PostgreSQL 7.4.23 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
EXPLAIN OUTPUT OF QUERY:
Unique (cost=22.73..22.90 rows=5 width=361)
Sort (cost=22.73..22.75 rows=5 width=361)
Sort Key: "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F","G", "H", "I", J, K, "L"
HashAggregate (cost=22.65..22.67 rows=5 width=361)
Seq Scan on exims (cost=0.00..22.50 rows=5 width=361)
Filter: ("L" = 1)
for both the servers I am using same input tables with 82011 records and results are server1: output of that query -> 82011 records server2: output of that query -> 53146 records
as for as I can see in server 2 uses Hashaggregate method while server1 uses groupaggregate?
can someone explain which one is the server result I should trust?
BR/ Vijay