Not to my knowledge. In fact, LINQ itself isn't particularly "relational" in the original "Codd" sense of the word. (SQL isn't either, but that's another story.)
Just to set the tone, LINQ doesn't even have a concept of a relation (loosely-speaking, a set of name/value tuples conforming to a heading, which is a name/type tuple). It deals with sequences rather than sets and objects instead of tuples. Even anonymous objects aren't the same thing as named tuples in the relational model sense, since new { b = 2, a = 1 }
is not only not equal to new { a = 1, b = 2 }
, they aren't even the same type!
To be fair, LINQ is a huge improvement over the data access train wrecks of the past 40 years, but it is just a teeny-tiny step in the right direction, and I suspect there is no intention of taking any further steps. In fact, LINQ-to-EF seems to me to be a huge step in the wrong direction, towards OO modelling and away from the relational model (of course, not everyone will agree with me on that one ;-).