RSpec: difference between "should == ..." and "should eql(...)"

Question

In RSpec, what's the difference between using should == ... and should eql(...)? I noticed that the RSpec documentation always uses eql, but == is less typing and easier to read. What am I missing?

Answer 1

I believe == and eql are interchangeable, just user preference.

Answer 2

They are usually equivalent, but not always:

1 ==   1.0 # => true
1.eql? 1.0 # => false

Answer 3

It's rather simple, really: should == sends the == message to the test subject, should eql sends the eql? message to the test subject. In other words: the two different tests send two completely different messages which invoke two completely different methods and thus do two completely different things. In particular, eql? is stricter than == but less strict than equals?.