Assuming no SecurityManager
is preventing you from doing this, you can use setAccessible
to get around private
and resetting the modifier to get rid of final
, and actually modify a private static final
field.
Here's an example:
import java.lang.reflect.*;
public class EverythingIsTrue {
static void setFinalStatic(Field field, Object newValue) throws Exception {
field.setAccessible(true);
Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
modifiersField.setInt(field, field.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
field.set(null, newValue);
}
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
setFinalStatic(Boolean.class.getField("FALSE"), true);
System.out.format("Everything is %s", false); // "Everything is true"
}
}
Assuming no SecurityException
is thrown, the above code prints "Everything is true"
.
What's actually done here is as follows:
- The primitive
boolean
values true
and false
in main
are autoboxed to reference type Boolean
"constants" Boolean.TRUE
and Boolean.FALSE
- Reflection is used to change the
public static final Boolean.FALSE
to refer to the Boolean
referred to by Boolean.TRUE
- As a result, subsequently whenever a
false
is autoboxed to Boolean.FALSE
, it refers to the same Boolean
as the one refered to by Boolean.TRUE
- Everything that was
"false"
now is "true"
Related questions
Caveats
Extreme care should be taken whenever you do something like this. It may not work because a SecurityManager
may be present, but even if it doesn't, depending on usage pattern, it may or may not work.
JLS 17.5.3 Subsequent Modification of Final Fields
In some cases, such as deserialization, the system will need to change the final
fields of an object after construction. final
fields can be changed via reflection and other implementation dependent means. The only pattern in which this has reasonable semantics is one in which an object is constructed and then the final
fields of the object are updated. The object should not be made visible to other threads, nor should the final
fields be read, until all updates to the final
fields of the object are complete. Freezes of a final
field occur both at the end of the constructor in which the final
field is set, and immediately after each modification of a final
field via reflection or other special mechanism.
Even then, there are a number of complications. If a final
field is initialized to a compile-time constant in the field declaration, changes to the final
field may not be observed, since uses of that final
field are replaced at compile time with the compile-time constant.
Another problem is that the specification allows aggressive optimization of final
fields. Within a thread, it is permissible to reorder reads of a final
field with those modifications of a final field that do not take place in the constructor.
See also
- JLS 15.28 Constant Expression
- It's unlikely that this technique works with a primitive
private static final boolean
, because it's inlineable as a compile-time constant and thus the "new" value may not be observable
Appendix: On the bitwise manipulation
Essentially,
field.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL
turns off the bit corresponding to Modifier.FINAL
from field.getModifiers()
. &
is the bitwise-and, and ~
is the bitwise-complement.
See also