views:

176

answers:

3
+8  Q: 

Package objects

Could someone please explain package objects, not so much the concept but their usage.

I've tried to get an example working and the only form I got to work was as follows:

package object investigations {
  val PackageObjectVal = "A package object val"
}

package investigations {

  object PackageObjectTest {
    def main(args: Array[String]) {
      println("Referencing a package object val: " + PackageObjectVal)
    }
  }
}

Observations I've made so far are:

package object _root_ { ... }

is disallowed (which is reasonable),

package object x.y { ... }

is also disallowed.

It seems that a package object must be declared in the immediate parent package and, if written as above, the brace delimited package declaration form is required.

Is anyone using them and, if so how?

Thanks.

+1  A: 

You could do worse than to go straight to the source. :)

https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/library/scala/package.scala

https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/library/scala/collection/immutable/package.scala

Alex Cruise
@Alex Cruise, thanks, this seems to suggest that they need a separate compilation unit (which perhaps gets round the brace delimited package restriction). The problem is I want some solid user advice rather than my own conjecture about how to use them.
Don Mackenzie
+12  A: 

Normally you would put your package object in a separate file called package.scala in the package that it corresponds to. You can also use the nested package syntax but that is quite unusual.

The main use case for package objects is when you need definitions in various places inside your package as well as outside the package when you use the API defined by the package. Here is an example:

package foo

package object bar {

  // package wide constants:
  def BarVersionString = "1.0"

  // or type aliases
  type StringMap[+T] = Map[String,T]

  // can be used to emulate a package wide import
  // especially useful when wrapping a Java API
  type DateTime = org.joda.time.DateTime

  type JList[T] = java.util.List[T]

  // Define implicits needed to effectively use your API:
  implicit def a2b(a: A): B = // ...

}

Now the definitions inside that package object are available inside the whole package foo.bar. Furthermore the definitions get imported when someone outside of that package imports foo.bar._.

This way you can prevent to require the API client to issue additional imports to use your library effectively - e.g. in scala-swing you need to write

import swing._
import Swing._

to have all the goodness like onEDT and implicit conversions from Tuple2 to Dimension.

Moritz
@Moritz, an excellent answer, thanks!
Don Mackenzie
Word of caution: method overloading doesn't work in package objects.
retronym
+1 I just read the article on scala-lang.org about this new feature and wanted to ask some practical use case because there is none described there. Thanks!
thSoft
+7  A: 

While Moritz's answer is spot on, one additional thing to note is that package objects are objects. Among other things, this means you can build them up from traits, using mix-in inheritance. Moritz's example could be written as

package object bar extends Versioning 
                          with JodaAliases 
                          with JavaAliases {

  // package wide constants:
  override val version = "1.0"

  // or type aliases
  type StringMap[+T] = Map[String,T]

  // Define implicits needed to effectively use your API:
  implicit def a2b(a: A): B = // ...

}

Here Versioning is an abstract trait, which says that the package object must have a "version" method, while JodaAliases and JavaAliases are concrete traits containing handy type aliases. All of these traits can be reused by many different package objects.

Dave Griffith
The whole topic is opening up a lot and it does seem to be used to it's full potential, thanks for another rich example.
Don Mackenzie