First of all, you should very seldom use $*
and you should almost always use "$@"
instead. There are a number of questions here on SO which explain the ins and outs of why.
Second - the env
command has two main uses. One is to print the current environment; the other is to completely control the environment of a command when it is run. The third use, which you are demonstrating, is to modify the environment, but frankly there's no need for that - the shells are quite capable of handling that for you.
Mode 1:
env
Mode 2:
env -i HOME=$HOME PATH=$PREPENDPATH:$PATH ... command args
This version cancels all inherited environment variables and runs command
with precisely the environment set by the ENVVAR=value options.
The third mode - amending the environment - is less important because you can do that fine with regular (civilized) shells. (That means "not C shell" - again, there are other questions on SO with answers that explain that.) For example, you could perfectly well do:
#!/bin/bash
export PATH=${PREPENDPATH:?}:$PATH
exec python "$@"
This insists that $PREPENDPATH
is set to a non-empty string in the environment, and then prepends it to $PATH
, and exports the new PATH setting. Then, using that new PATH, it executes the python
program with the relevant arguments. The exec
replaces the shell script with python
. Note that this is quite different from:
#!/bin/bash
PATH=${PREPENDPATH:?}:$PATH exec python "$@"
Superficially, this is the same. However, this will execute the python
found on the pre-existing PATH, albeit with the new value of PATH in the process's environment. So, in the example, you'd end up executing Python from /usr/bin
and not the one from /home/pi/prepend/bin
.
In your situation, I would probably not use env
and would just use an appropriate variant of the script with the explicit export.
The env
command is unusual because it does not recognize the double-dash to separate options from the rest of the command. This is in part because it does not take many options, and in part because it is not clear whether the ENVVAR=value options should come before or after the double dash.
I actually have a series of scripts for running (different versions of) a database server. These scripts really use env
(and a bunch of home-grown programs) to control the environment of the server:
#!/bin/ksh
#
# @(#)$Id: boot.black_19.sh,v 1.3 2008/06/25 15:44:44 jleffler Exp $
#
# Boot server black_19 - IDS 11.50.FC1
IXD=/usr/informix/11.50.FC1
IXS=black_19
cd $IXD || exit 1
IXF=$IXD/do.not.start.$IXS
if [ -f $IXF ]
then
echo "$0: will not start server $IXS because file $IXF exists" 1>&2
exit 1
fi
ONINIT=$IXD/bin/oninit.$IXS
if [ ! -f $ONINIT ]
then ONINIT=$IXD/bin/oninit
fi
tmpdir=$IXD/tmp
DAEMONIZE=/work1/jleffler/bin/daemonize
stdout=$tmpdir/$IXS.stdout
stderr=$tmpdir/$IXS.stderr
if [ ! -d $tmpdir ]
then asroot -u informix -g informix -C -- mkdir -p $tmpdir
fi
# Specialized programs carried to extremes:
# * asroot sets UID and GID values and then executes
# * env, which sets the environment precisely and then executes
# * daemonize, which makes the process into a daemon and then executes
# * oninit, which is what we really wanted to run in the first place!
# NB: daemonize defaults stdin to /dev/null and could set umask but
# oninit dinks with it all the time so there is no real point.
# NB: daemonize should not be necessary, but oninit doesn't close its
# controlling terminal and therefore causes cron-jobs that restart
# it to hang, and interactive shells that started it to hang, and
# tracing programs.
# ??? Anyone want to integrate truss into this sequence?
asroot -u informix -g informix -C -a dbaao -a dbsso -- \
env -i HOME=$IXD \
INFORMIXDIR=$IXD \
INFORMIXSERVER=$IXS \
INFORMIXCONCSMCFG=$IXD/etc/concsm.$IXS \
IFX_LISTEN_TIMEOUT=3 \
ONCONFIG=onconfig.$IXS \
PATH=/usr/bin:$IXD/bin \
SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh \
TZ=UTC0 \
$DAEMONIZE -act -d $IXD -o $stdout -e $stderr -- \
$ONINIT "$@"
case "$*" in
(*v*) track-oninit-v $stdout;;
esac