I have not been able to benchmark the implementation, but an alternative - and more comprehensive - selection of generic collection classes is available from the University of Copenhagen here:
http://www.itu.dk/research/c5/
They offer a number of generic Dictionary implementations with differing backing solutions (Trees, HashTables etc.) It may be that one of these suits your needs. Performance was a prime factor in the development of this class library.
Of course, I'd recommend that you try the BCL generic Dictionary class first, as it will save you time and may suit your performance requirements just fine.