With the entire file in a scalar, write your pattern so it captures the lines before and after line3. The /m modifier is especially useful:
Treat string as multiple lines. That is, change ^ and $ from matching the start or end of the string to matching the start or end of any line anywhere within the string.
The patterns below use the /x modifier that lets us add whitespace to make them look like what they're matching.
For example:
#! /usr/bin/perl
my $data = do { local $/; <DATA> };
my $pattern = qr/ ^(.+\n)
^line3\n
^(.+\n)
/mx;
if ($data =~ /$pattern/) {
print $1, $2;
}
else {
print "no match\n";
}
__DATA__
line1
line2
line3
line4
line5
Output:
line2
line4
Remember that $ is an assertion: it doesn't consume any characters, so you have to match newline with a literal \n pattern.
Also note that the pattern above lacks generality. It works fine for a line somewhere in the middle, but it will fail if you change line3 to line1 or line5.
For the line1 case, you could make the previous line optional with a ? quantifier:
my $pattern = qr/ ^(.+\n)?
^line1\n
^(.+\n)
/mx;
As expected, this produces output of
line2
But trying the same fix for the line5 case
my $pattern = qr/ ^(.+\n)?
^line5\n
^(.+\n)?
/mx;
gives
no match
This is because after the final newline in the file (the one following line5), ^ has nowhere to match, but changing the pattern to
my $pattern = qr/ ^(.+\n)?
^line5\n
(^.+\n)?
/mx;
outputs
line4
We might stop here, but the asymmetry in the pattern is unpleasing. Why did work for one case and not for the other? With line1, ^ matches the beginning of $data and then matches nothing for (.+\n)?.
Remember: patterns quantified with ? or * always succeed because they're semantically the same as
- zero times or one time
- zero or more times
respectively, and anything can match zero times:
$ perl -le 'print scalar "abc" =~ /(?!)*/'
1
Although I can't think of a time I've ever seen it used this way, an {m,n} quantifier where m is zero, e.g.,
will always succeed because m is the minimum number of repetitions. The {0} quantifier is a pathological case included for completeness.
All that was to show we more or less got lucky with the line1 case. ^ matched the very beginning, the ?-quantified pattern matched nothing, and then the next ^ also matched the very beginning of $data.
Restoring symmetry makes a cleaner pattern:
my $pattern = qr/ (^.+\n)?
^line5\n
(^.+\n)?
/mx;