I have a huge volume of thumbnailing to do. Currently, I am using ImageMagick, but it's proving too inefficient (it's too slow, uses too much CPU/memory, etc.).
I have started to evaluate GraphicsMagick, which I expected to get "wow" results from. I didn't get them. Can someone take a quick look at my benchmark script (does simple speed and file size comparison only; no CPU and memory checks yet):
Here's a sample output I got:
'gm convert' took 75.0039 seconds to execute 10 iteration(s).
'convert' took 83.1421 seconds to execute 10 iteration(s).
Average filesize of gm convert: 144,588 bytes.
Average filesize of convert: 81,194 bytes.
GraphicsMagick is not that much faster -- and the outputted file sizes are SIGNIFICANTLY higher than ImageMagick.