it seems that the :controller
option doesn't do anything? Won't specifying the whole path be a little bit lower level than specifying using :controller
?
views:
13answers:
1
+1
A:
To my knowledge, i checked the documentation, there is no :controller
option, and i think it is just ignored.
Also, i believe it is a shorter notation. If you compare
:template => 'controller/action'
with
:controller => 'controller', :action => 'action'
It is pretty obvious (at least to me) that it has the same meaning. Also, this is more generic, because sometimes controllers (and views) are nested.
nathanvda
2010-09-21 09:21:42