views:

125

answers:

3

I have two persistence.xml files, for the sake of testing:

  • src/main/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml
  • src/test/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml

How to instruct Maven to ignore the first file during testing? Now it is not ignored since OpenEJB says:

ERROR - FAIL ... Finder: @PersistenceContext unitName has multiple matches: 
unitName "abc" has 2 possible matches.
A: 

I think you can create two profiles in your pom.xml:

<properties>
  <environment>dev</environment>
</properties>
<profiles>
  <profile>
    <id>prod</id>
    <properties>
      <environment>test</environment>
    </properties>
  </profile>
</profiles>

After that, in your src folder, create two folders named dev/resoruces and test/resources and copy your different resources there. After that, add something like this:

<resources>
  <resource>
    <directory>${basedir}/src/main/resources</directory>
    <filtering>false</filtering>
  </resource>
  <resource>
    <directory>${basedir}/src/main/${environment}/resources</directory>
    <filtering>true</filtering>
  </resource>
</resources>

The ${basedir} depends on the command line parameter, it can be test or dev. You run the maven command like this: mvn clean package -P test.

virgium03
@virgium03 Looks like a very "dirty" solution, since I always have to remember that tests are to be run with `mvn test -P test`, not as usual `mvn test`...
Vincenzo
+2  A: 

Check out the alternate descriptors functionality which is aimed at what you're trying to do.

Try this setup:

  • src/main/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml
  • src/main/resources/META-INF/test.persistence.xml

Then you can construct OpenEJB to prefer the test.persistence.xml file by setting the openejb.altdd.prefix System or InitialContext property to test

A different possible solution could be to override the persistence unit properties in the test. With that approach you could avoid the need for a second persistence.xml which can be nice as maintaining two can be a pain.

You can use the Maven approach, but be aware that per spec the persistence provider will only look (aka scan) for @Entity beans in the exact jar or directory where the persistence.xml is found. So be keenly aware that in Maven these are two different locations:

  • target/classes
  • target/test-classes

EDIT More details on the overriding capabilities

You can override any property in your test setup via either system properties or the initial context properties (this includes jndi.properties files). The format is:

<unit-name>.<property>=<value>

So for example with the following persistence.xml:

<persistence>
  <persistence-unit name="movie-unit">
    <provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider>
    <jta-data-source>movieDatabase</jta-data-source>
    <non-jta-data-source>movieDatabaseUnmanaged</non-jta-data-source>
    <properties>
      <property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="create-drop"/>
      <property name="hibernate.max_fetch_depth" value="3"/>
    </properties>
  </persistence-unit>
</persistence>

You can override and add persistence unit properties in your test case. There are currently no facilities for removing them (if you have a need for that let us know – it hasn't really come up so far).

Properties p = new Properties();
p.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"org.apache.openejb.client.LocalInitialContextFactory");

p.put("movie-unit.hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto", "update");
p.put("movie-unit.hibernate.dialect", "org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect");

context = new InitialContext(p);

Or alternatively via a jndi.properties file

java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.openejb.client.LocalInitialContextFactory
movie-unit.hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto = update
movie-unit.hibernate.dialect = org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect
David Blevins
@David Yes, I'm using Maven, and it's important to strictly separate production `persistence.xml` and testing `persistence.xml`. That's why I strongly disagree with the idea of placing `test.persistence.xml` into `src/main/resources`.
Vincenzo
From the look of your other posts, it looks like you could easily get away with just the override option linked above. That's the more ideal option as maintaining two persistence.xml files is a pain.
David Blevins
@David Exactly, I already sorted all this out, thanks for your help
Vincenzo
A: 

Better add both files - in general, making test/production or debug/profile/production distinction in build makes only trouble. Better try to use different perasistence unit name for production (say abc-production) and for tests (abc-tests).

iirekm
@iiekm If there are two different unit names - how can I run my unit tests with automated injection of `EntityManager` by `unitName`?
Vincenzo
I have never used @PersistenceContext so I won't tell you with itin Spring - just create two Spring XML files; let one be used for regular application (you usually choose it in web.xml), another for test (you choose it inside test code); let the one for production create an EntityManager with persistence context abc-production, the other with abc-tests
iirekm