tags:

views:

73

answers:

2

I recently was working on a little python project and came to a situation where I wanted to pass self into the constructor of another object. I'm not sure why, but I had to look up whether this was legal in python. I've done this many times in C++ and Java but I don't remember ever having to do this with python.

Is passing references to self to new objects something that isn't considered pythonic? I don't think I've seen any python programs explicitly passing self references around. Have I just happen to not have a need for it until now? Or am I fighting python style?

+5  A: 

Yes it is legal, and yes it is pythonic.

I find myself using this pattern when you have an object and a container object where the contained objects need to know about their parent.

Nick Craig-Wood
Yeah I understand why you need to do it, but I'm just not sure why I haven't seen it done very much in python.
Falmarri
Possibly because python has a wicked set of polymorphic container types which in general are sufficient for all your needs?
Nick Craig-Wood
Can adapter pattern be considered one of the uses, I mean if we don't consider parameter to be passed as *self* but another object instance which has to be contained.
Ashish
A: 

Just pass it like a parameter. Of course, it won't be called self in the other initializer...

class A:
    def __init__(self, num, target):
        self.num = num
        self.target = target

class B:
    def __init__(self, num):
        self.a = A(num, self)

a = A(1)
b = B(2)
print b.a.num # prints 2
Mike DeSimone
I think this is more or less asking whether its _pythonic_, not how.
mathepic