Azure php webRole, f# worker role: developping on different machines

Question

Hello,

A friend and I would like to do a website to manipulate facebook data.

The structure is:

• a php webrole (contains the webpage, user oauth login, interacts with queues, and interacts with sql azure database)
• a F# worker role (does statistics and quite heavy data extractions)

The process is (assuming a new user):

• user arrives on the webpage and oauth on facebook, the php webrole then posts a messages in a worktodo queue with the login info and token.

• F# worker role reads the message off the worktodo queue and starts doing data crunching (facebook api ) and stats, then it writes the results in a sql azure database. Finally it posts a message to the workdone queue stating it has succeeded in doing the dataprocessing for the user.

• Finally the php webrole reads the workdone queue and notices the work is done, and displays the algorithm results.

I have two questions:

• is there a big flaw in this design?

• what is the best way to collaborate: one person will do the php and another the F#, is there a way to use developpement storage from two different machines?

Thanks a lot! (apologizes if some find this stuff too basic, I am very much a beginner in all these matters)

Answer 1

If you wanted to follow a bit more experimental path, you could also try looking at Phalanger. This is a project that compiles PHP code to .NET, so it may be possible to run it directly on Azure and nicely collaborate with F# (Phalanger has a few language extensions that allow you to call any .NET objects and some API for calling Phalanger objects from C#).

I was involved in the project some time ago, but it is now beign developed by other people (and as you can see from the check-ins, it is quite active again and they would surely be interested in collaborating to resolve possible Azure issues). If you were interested, let me know - I can give you some contacts, so that you can discuss the Phalanger status on Azure with them.

Answer 2

I don't see anything wrong with this plan.

I don't think there's a way to have two machines pointing at the same development storage, but you can just use cloud storage (even when running locally). I do that all of the time; you will pay for bandwidth and storage transactions, but for most apps in testing, this cost is trivial.