let vs def in clojure

Question

I want to make a local instance of a Java Scanner class in a clojure program. Why does this not work:

;gives me:  count not supported on this type: Symbol 
(let s (new Scanner "a b c"))

but it will let me create a global instance like this:

(def s (new Scanner "a b c"))

I was under the impression that the only difference was scope, but apparently not. What is the difference between let and def?

Answer 1

Correct syntax:

(let [s (Scanner. "a b c")] ...)

Answer 2

The problem is that your use of let is wrong.

Let works like this:

(let [identifier (expr)])

So your example should be something like this:

(let [s (Scanner. "a b c")]
  (exprs))

You can only use the lexical bindings made with let within the scope of let (the opening and closing parens). Let just creates a set of lexical bindings. def and let do pretty much the same thing. I use def for making a global binding and lets for binding something I want only in the scope of the let as it keeps things clean. They both have their uses.

NOTE: (Class.) is the same as (new Class), it's just syntactic sugar.

Answer 3

The syntax for them is different, even if the meanings are related.

let takes a list of bindings (name value pairs) followed by expressions to evaluate in the context of those binding.

def just takes one binding, not a list, and adds it to the global context.

Answer 4

LET is not "make a lexical binding in the current scope", but "make a new lexical scope with the following bindings".

(let [s (foo whatever)]
  ;; s is bound here
  )
;; but not here

(def s (foo whatever))
;; s is bound here

Answer 5

Simplified: def is for global constants, let is for local variables.