tags:

views:

1032

answers:

4

Hi everyone...

I love to use LINQ on .net, but I wonder to know how does that works internally?

Does anyone know that?

Thks.

+1  A: 

Basically linq is a mixture of some language facilities (compiler) and some framework extensions. So when you write linq queries, they get executed using appropriate interfaces such as IQuerable. Also note that the runtime has no role in linq.

But it is difficult to do justice to linq in a short answer. I recommend you read some book to get yourself in it. I am not sure about the book that tells you internals of Linq but Linq in Action gives a good handson about it.

Hemant
+2  A: 

In simple a form, the compiler takes your code-query and converts it into a bunch of generic classes and calls. Underneath, in case of Linq2Sql, a dynamic SQL query gets constructed and executed using DbCommand, DbDataReader etc.

Say you have:

var q = from x in dc.mytable select x;

it gets converted into following code:

IQueryable<tbl_dir_office> q = 
    dc.mytable.Select<tbl_dir_office, tbl_dir_office>(
        Expression.Lambda<Func<mytable, mytable>>(
            exp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(mytable), "x"), 
            new ParameterExpression[] { exp }
        )
    );

Lots of generics, huge overhead.

Ruslan
Huge overhead? what do you mean?
Pop Catalin
The Select about will end up calling a provider's execute method, which initialize mode, determine connection, check transactions, initialize parameter collections, call a reader, translate results, parse... thousands of lines.
Ruslan
@Ruslan, almost all the things you mentioned you have to do anyway so they are not considered overhead, and besides, checking some things like if there is a transaction attached has a tiny cost compared to executing the command on the DB.
Pop Catalin
The only overhead Linq has is translating the expression tree into a SQL query... but that doesn't have anything to do with generics, from your answer I thought you said the generics are the overhead.
Pop Catalin
No, I didn't mean generics. I meant lots of code behind doing what is normally done by the SQL server. IIRC, when asked at PDC about LINQ performance, they said something around 15% overhead. I'd have to do profiling myself.
Ruslan
+2  A: 

LINQ is basically a combination of C# 3.0 discrete features of these:

  • local variable type inference
  • auto properties (not implemented in VB 9.0)
  • extension methods
  • lambda expressions
  • anonymous type initializers
  • query comprehension

For more information about the journey to get there (LINQ), see this video of Anders in LANGNET 2008:

http://download.microsoft.com/download/c/e/5/ce5434ca-4f54-42b1-81ea-7f5a72f3b1dd/1-01%20-%20CSharp3%20-%20Anders%20Hejlsberg.wmv

eriawan
Auto properties don't play a role in LINQ and aren't in VB9.
Dustin Campbell
Yes, you're right, VB 9.0 doesn't have it. I'll edit my answer.
eriawan
I think you missed the main point that auto properties have nothing to do with LINQ.
Dustin Campbell
Have you watched the video and have you looked at System.Core.dll source code? You'll see what I mean. In fact, LINQ is implemented using auto properties that also providing infrastructure to quickly code anonymous type initializers.
eriawan
+11  A: 

It makes more sense to ask about a particular aspect of LINQ. It's a bit like asking "How Windows works" otherwise.

The key parts of LINQ are for me, from a C# perspective:

  • Expression trees. These are representations of code as data. For instance, an expression tree could represent the notion of "take a string parameter, call the Length property on it, and return the result". The fact that these exist as data rather than as compiled code means that LINQ providers such as LINQ to SQL can analyze them and convert them into SQL.
  • Lambda expressions. These are expressions like this:

    x => x * 2
    (int x, int y) => x * y
    () => { Console.WriteLine("Block"); Console.WriteLine("Lambda"); }
    

    Lambda expressions are converted either into delegates or expression trees.

  • Anonymous types. These are expressions like this:

    new { X=10, Y=20 }
    

    These are still statically typed, it's just the compiler generates an immutable type for you with properties X and Y. These are usually used with var which allows the type of a local variable to be inferred from its initialization expression.

  • Query expressions. These are expressions like this:

    from person in people
    where person.Age < 18
    select person.Name
    

    These are translated by the C# compiler into "normal" C# 3.0 (i.e. a form which doesn't use query expressions). Overload resolution etc is applied afterwards, which is absolutely key to being able to use the same query syntax with multiple data types, without the compiler having any knowledge of types such as Queryable. The above expression would be translated into:

    people.Where(person => person.Age < 18)
          .Select(person => person.Name)
    
  • Extension methods. These are static methods which can be used as if they were instance methods of the type of the first parameter. For example, an extension method like this:

    public static int CountAsciiDigits(this string text)
    {
        return text.Count(letter => letter >= '0' && letter <= '9');
    }
    

    can then be used like this:

    string foo = "123abc456";
    int count = foo.CountAsciiDigits();
    

    Note that the implementation of CountAsciiDigits uses another extension method, Enumerable.Count().

That's most of the relevant language aspects. Then there are the implementations of the standard query operators, in LINQ providers such as LINQ to Objects and LINQ to SQL etc. I have a presentation about how it's reasonably simple to implement LINQ to Objects - it's on the "Talks" page of the C# in Depth web site.

The way providers such as LINQ to SQL work is generally via the Queryable class. At their core, they translate expression trees into other query formats, and then construct appropriate objects with the results of executing those out-of-process queries.

Does that cover everything you were interested in? If there's anything in particular you still want to know about, just edit your question and I'll have a go.

Jon Skeet
@Jon - You are too good on explaining things... I bought your book last month for 7$... I found it very interesting and funny technical book I have ever red...
Prashant
You're very kind :)
Jon Skeet