Is there a max length for class/method/variable names in Java? the JLS doesn't seem to mention that. I know very long names are problematic anyway from code readability and maintainability perspective, but just out of curiosity is there a limitation (I guess class names might be limited by the file system maximal file name limitation).
+6
A:
If I'm not mistaken, the limit is not in the language itself but in the classfile format, which limits names to 64k, so for all practical intents and purposes identifier length is not a problem. Specifically, this is the definition of a constant string in the pool, which seems to imply the maximal length is 16 bit:
CONSTANT_Utf8_info {
u1 tag;
u2 length;
u1 bytes[length];
}
Class names may be more of an issue for file systems, I agree, I'm not sure what's currently supported.
Uri
2009-03-30 03:53:16
+4
A:
Sorry, actually found the answer in the JLS: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/lexical.html#40625 It seems that identifier names are of unlimited length.
Also found similar question (though it didn't appear in my initial search, or when I typed the question title which is weird): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/425988/maximum-method-name-length
talg
2009-03-30 03:54:37
That's for the language, but the class file format is more restrictive.
Uri
2009-03-30 03:57:32
Which is actually fairly surprising, considering that the language was meant to compile for the classfiles...
Uri
2009-03-30 04:00:20
true, I wonder what happens if you actually try to create a ridiculously long variable name
talg
2009-03-30 04:31:22
+3
A:
If you go over the size limit imposed by the VM for method names then you get a compiler error (at least with the version of javac I am using):
Main.java:1: UTF8 representation for string "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..." is too long for the constant pool
TofuBeer
2009-03-30 05:30:43