This code works:
#!/bin/perl -w
use strict;
sub PrintAA
{
my($test, %aa) = @_;
print $test . "\n";
foreach (keys %aa)
{
print $_ . " : " . $aa{$_} . "\n";
}
}
my(%hash) = ( 'aaa' => 1, 'bbb' => 'balls', 'ccc' => \&PrintAA );
PrintAA("test", %hash);
The key point is the use of the array context in the my() 'statement' in the function.
What does the array context business actually do?
Succinctly, it makes it work correctly.
It means that the first value in the @_
array of arguments is assigned to $test
, and the remaining items are assigned to the hash %aa
. Given the way I called it, there is an odd number of items in the @_
, so once the first item is assigned to $test
, there is an even number of items available to assign to %aa
, with the first item of each pair being the key ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc' in my example), and the second being the corresponding value.
It would be possible to replace %aa
with @aa
, in which case, the array would have 6 items in it. It would also be possible to replace %aa
with $aa
, and in that case, the variable $aa
would contain the value 'aaa', and the remaining values in @_
would be ignored by the assignment.
If you omit the parentheses around the variable list, Perl refuses to compile the code.
One of the alternative answers showed the notation:
my $test = shift;
my(%aa) = @_;
This is pretty much equivalent to what I wrote; the difference is that after the two my
statements, @_
only contains 6 elements in this variation, whereas in the single my
version, it still contains 7 elements.
There are definitely other questions in SO about array context.
Actually, I wasn't asking about the my($test, %aa) = @_;
I was asking about my(%hash) = ( 'aaa' => 1, 'bbb' => 'balls', 'ccc' => \&PrintAA );
versus my %hash = { 'aaa' => 1, ... };
The difference is that the { ... } notation generates a hash ref and the ( ... ) notation generates a list, which maps to a hash (as opposed to hash ref). Similarly, [ ... ] generates an array ref and not an array.
Indeed, change the 'main' code so it reads: my(%hash) = { ... }; and you get a run-time (but not compile time) error - treat line numbers with caution since I've added alternative codings to my file:
Reference found where even-sized list expected at xx.pl line 18.
...
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at xx.pl line 13.