My company currently use CruiseControl.NET, which I find quite a pain on the neck to configure. What CI solution do you use?
+1
A:
I haven't tried it but I've heard Team Foundation has some features that let you have automated builds.
Beatles1692
2009-05-26 04:20:37
Yes, we do that, a bit tricky to get going, but works well :)
leppie
2009-05-26 04:26:40
+3
A:
We use TeamCity which costs some coin, but is a huge step up from cruise control. It's simple, easy to configure and gives you tons of feedback on your builds. I'd highly recommend it.
lomaxx
2009-05-26 04:25:49
I'm interested in TeamCity, but we've recently switched to SourceGear Vault for source control, which last time I checked, wasn't supported by TC. Any changes on that front?
Chris Doggett
2009-05-26 15:18:56
A:
We use CC or TeamCity by JetBrains (It's Free). I choose TeamCity over CC any day.
Rune FS
2009-05-26 06:39:11
+1
A:
We used to use Cruise Control but changed to use TeamCity.
The automated build works really well and we would not want to develop without it now.
Thomas Bratt
2009-05-26 13:26:08
A:
We use Zed Builds and Bugs here. They have a community edition that is free for small setups, and a commercial version for larger projects/usage.
Nice features: there's no XML to edit to define your builds, and the whole thing is done using a very clean and consistent UI.
Steven M. Cherry
2009-05-26 15:16:31
+2
A:
On my current project, we're using Bamboo, by Atlassian. I like it, and it has some pretty nice plugins available if you're using JIRA for bug tracking.
What has really helped us is that it is very flexible. We have a multiple Java and .NET apps, and Bamboo handles them all very well. It's not free, but if you have a complicated environment and build system, it works pretty well.
swilliams
2009-05-26 15:23:43