views:

1631

answers:

7

Is there any good reason to avoid unused import statements in Java? As I understand it, they are there for the compiler, so lots of unused imports won't have any impacts on the compiled code. Is it just to reduce clutter and to avoid naming conflicts down the line?

(I ask because Eclipse gives a warning about unused imports, which is kind of annoying when I'm developing code because I don't want to remove the imports until I'm pretty sure I'm done designing the class.)

+12  A: 

One would be that if you remove the class referenced by the import from the classpath, you won't get a silly compiler error that served no purpose. And you won't get false positives when you performe a "where used" search.

Another (but this would be very specific in nature) would be if the unused import had naming conflicts with another import, causing you to use fully qualified names needlessly.

Addendum: Today the build server started failing compilation (not even test running) with an out of memory error. It ran fine forever and the check-ins didn't have any changes to the build process or significant additions that could explain this. After attempting to increase memory settings (this is running a 64 bit JVM on a 64 bit CentOS!) to something well beyond where the clients could compile, I examined the checkins one by one.

There was an improper import that a developer had used and abandoned (they used the class, auto-imported it, and then realized it was a mistake). That unused import pulled in a whole separate tier of the application which, while the IDE isn't configured to separate them, the build process is. That single import dragged in so much garbage and so many issues that it caused the out of memory error. It took an hour to solve this problem caused by an unused import.

Yishai
+1 for where used search, i hadn't thought of that one
Kip
@Yishai, if you use Eclipse look into Save Actions, which can normalize source code everytime you save.
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
@Thorbjørn, you can do the same thing in IDEA (basically - it doesn't really have a save event, it saves all the time) as well as optimize imports at checkin, but it is not enabled by default and this developer did not have it enabled.
Yishai
There's something wrong here. Unused imports don't affect the byte code in the slightest.
EJP
@EJP, although they don't affect the resulting bytecode, the compiler needs to resolve them to understand the bytecode it needs to create.
Yishai
I'm well aware of that but it doesn't explain the problem the poster described, unless it occurred at compile time, which wasn't stated.
EJP
+21  A: 

I don't think that performance problems or something like that are likely if you are not removing the imports.

But there could be naming conflicts, in rare cases like importing the list interface.

In Eclipse you can always use a shortcut (depends on OS SHIFT + ALT + O (COMMAND + SHIFT + O on mac)) to organize the imports. Eclipse then cleans up the import section removes all the stare imports etc. If you are needing a imported thing again eclipse will add them automatically while you are completing the statement with CONTROL + SPACE. So there is no need in keeping unused code in you class.

As always unused code will distract you and other people while reading the code and leaving something in your active code because of maybe I need it later is mostly seen as bad practice.

Janusz
It's actually Ctrl+Shift+O on windows.
Matt Ball
A: 

Warning? Ask Eclipse to automagically clean them up for you. That's what IntelliJ does. If it's smart enough to warn you, it should be smart enough to clean them up. I'd recommend looking for an Eclipse setting to tell it to stop being such a nag and do something.

duffymo
Thats Save Actions. Personally I like that Eclipse only changes your code when you explicitly have asked for it.
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
@Thorbjørn: Agreed, especially if it is a class I've stopped using for a little bit but which I expect to be adding back in again shortly.
Donal Fellows
@Donal, well, that is what Ctrl-Space is for.
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
+3  A: 

From a purist point of view, any dependency is a "constraint" on the product and can thus cause maintenance problems later.

For example, let's assume that your program uses the class com.X.Y.Z.ObjectPool, and that later on you decide not to use it but never remove the import. If somebody else now wants to instantiate org.W.V.Y.ObjectPool and just refer to ObjectPool, they don't get any warning about it until somewhere down the line there's a casting problem or invocation problem.

This is, by the way, not an unrealistic scenario. Every time you had Eclipse ask you which specific version of X you wanted to import, and you picked one from among many packages, is a scenario where if you have had the import there you might have gotten the wrong choice without knowing about it.

Either way, you can ask Eclipse to clean these up for you

Uri
A: 

I read somewhere, some years ago, that every imported class would be loaded at runtime with the importing class. So removing unused, especially whole packages, would reduce memory overhead. Although I suppose that modern versions of java deal with that, so probably it is not a reason anymore.

And by the way, with eclipse you can use Ctrl+Shift+O to organize imports, but you can also configure a "cleaner" that deal with such things (and many others) each time you save a java file.

zim2001
hmm.. i would be surprisedif that was the behavior.. i know classes aren't initialized (i.e. calling the static initializers) until first use, or until they are specifically requested by a custom loader. but if by "loaded" you just mean "read into memory but not processed" it is possible, though i doubt it.
Kip
actually, upon further thought, it should be fairly easy to test. compile code with unused imports, then use a "decompile" tool and see if the unused imports are still there or not. if not then either they are being removed by the compiler, or they are just there for convenience to the programmer.
Kip
Where on earth did you read that? It is *completely and utterly* incorrect, and always has been. Every class *referenced by the code* will be loaded, *not* including imports.
EJP
+1  A: 

This has to do with clarity of the program useful for maintenance.

If you had to maintain a program you'll find how useful is to have a single class import per line.

Think about the following scenario:

import company.billing.*;
import company.humanrerources.*;

// other imports 


class SomeClass {
      // hundreds or thousands of lines here... 
    public void veryImportantMethod() {
      Customer customer;
      Employee comployee;
      Department dept. 
      // do something with them
     }
 }

When you're bugfixing or maintaining piece of code ( or only reading it ) it is very helpful for the reader to know to which package do the classes used belong to. Using the wildcard import as shown above doesn't help for that purpose.

Even with an IDE, you don't want to hover or jump to declaration and return, it is easier if you understand in terms of functionality what other packages and classes the current code depends on.

If this is for a personal project or something small, it really doesn't matter, but for something larger that have to be used by other developers ( and maintained through the years ) this is a MUST HAVE.

There is absolutely no performance difference with any.

OscarRyz
A: 

For eclipse i use this: window -> preferences -> java -> editor -> save action -> check the checkbox for organize imports (there are a lot of other useful stuff there too, like formatting, making fields final and so on..). So when i save my file eclipse removes the unessacry imports for me. In my opinion, if you don't need something then remove it (or let it be removed by eclipse).

kukudas