tags:

views:

157

answers:

2

When it's about archiving and doc portability, it's all about PDF. I heard about DjVu somes years ago, and it seems to be now mature enough for serious usages. The benefits seems to be a small size format and a fast open / read experience.

But I have absolutely no feedback on how good / bad it is in the real world :

  • Is it technically hard to implement in traditional information management tools ?
  • Is is worth learning / implementing solution to generate / parse it when you now PDF ?
  • Is the final user feedback good when it comes to day to day use ?
  • How do you manage exchanges with the external world (the one with a PDF only state of mind) ?
  • As a programmer, what are the pro and cons ?
  • And what would you use to convince your boss to (or not to) use DjVU ?
  • And globally, what gain did you noticed after including DjVu in your workflow ?

Bonus question : do you know some good Python libs to hack some quick and dirty scripts as a begining ?

EDIT : doing some research, I ended up getting that Wikimedia use it to internally store its book collection but can't find any feedback about it. Anybody involved in that project around here ?

A: 

I have never heard of this, or anyone using this, before, and as such, I would stay quite far away from it unless it has some serious benefits over other formats.

Jani Hartikainen
That's definitly not an answer. I know people that have never heard of Linux, being in the computing business... What's more, it would mean that no new technology would be ever introduced because no one would try it first. It's important to test new product, even in a small sample. But yes, it implies risks so it's always good to know if somebody tried before, and that's why I'm asking.
e-satis
I agree with e-satis, this isn't really an answer. There's risks involved with using any new tech, but if everyone took your attitude, then nothing would ever change. I'd never heard of it either, but a quick trip to google very quickly told me all the relevant details. In my opinion, that's a very good start.
Matthew Scharley
+2  A: 

I've found DjVu to be ideal for image-intensive documents. I used to sell books of highly details maps, and those were always in DjVu. PDF however works really well; it's a standard, and -everybody- will be able to open it without installing additional software.

There's more info at: http://print-driver.com/news/pdf-vs-djvu-i1909.html

Personally, I'd say until its graphic-rich documents, just stick to PDF.

Milan Ramaiya
At what cost (time, ressources, money) did you do this DjVu conversion other PDF ? Did you customers really found an added value in using DjVu ? Did they overchoose PDF is there was a choice ? Did they report trouble using DjVu ?
e-satis
If I remember correctly ... this was a couple years back ...My sources were in DjVu so I didn't have to make conversions to it. However, on a CD I would provide the DjVu files, a free DjVu program, as well as a file converted to PDF.For the conversion, I used some command-line utility I found. The PDFs tended to be much larger in size, and much slower in rendering pages.
Milan Ramaiya