You have to "revert the revert". Depends on how did you revert that, it may not be as easy as it sounds. Look at the official document on this topic.
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x---Y
/
---A---B-------------------C---D
to allow:
---o---o---o---M---x---x-------x-------*
/ /
---A---B-------------------C---D
But does it all work? Sure it does. You can revert a merge, and from a purely technical angle, git did it very naturally and had no real troubles.
It just considered it a change from "state before merge" to "state after merge", and that was it.
Nothing complicated, nothing odd, nothing really dangerous. Git will do it without even thinking about it.So from a technical angle, there's nothing wrong with reverting a merge, but from a workflow angle it's something that you generally should try to avoid.
If at all possible, for example, if you find a problem that got merged into the main tree, rather than revert the merge, try really hard to:
- bisect the problem down into the branch you merged, and just fix it,
- or try to revert the individual commit that caused it.
Yes, it's more complex, and no, it's not always going to work (sometimes the answer is: "oops, I really shouldn't have merged it, because it wasn't ready yet, and I really need to undo all of the merge"). So then you really should revert the merge, but when you want to re-do the merge, you now need to do it by reverting the revert.