Hello everyone.
I know that the Hudson vs. CC issue has been beaten (discussed) to death, but I would have a question from a different angle: which one of them (or maybe an entirely different CI product) is suitable for a legacy project?
What I would specifically need is the possibility to filter out problems before a certain date. Some examples which hopefully make this clearer:
- Unit-tests missing on classes older than X shouldn't be reported (or even better, reported in a separate field and should cause the build to break)
- Bugs found by the static analyzer (FindBugs for example) in code older than X should be reported (or as above - reported separately / shouldn't break the build)
The reasoning: it is unfeasible to expect that people will stop whatever development they are doing just for the sake of creating 100% unit-test coverage and fixing / analyzing all the bugs reported by FindBugs. A much more acceptable solution would be to ensure that no further problems appear, and that the historical classes are resolved when somebody touches them. I would like some product/project which would generate the appropriate reports/warnings for this situation.
Is there a generic / preconfigured solution like this, or do I need to build it from scratch (adding custom plugins for one of the existing CI solutions for example)?