I have a metafunction:
struct METAFUNCION
{
template<class T>
struct apply
{
typedef T type;
};
};
Then I define a helper:
template<class T1, class T2>
struct HELPER
{
};
And then I have second metafunction which derives from the METAFUNCTION above and defines partial specialization of apply struct:
struct METAFUNCION2 : METAFUNCION
{
template<class T1, class T2>
struct apply<HELPER<T1, T2> > : METAFUNCION::apply<T2>
{
};
};
So far, so good - the code compiles under g++ 4.3.2. So I used it like below:
#include <typeinfo>
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cxxabi.h>
template<typename T>
struct type_info2
{
static std::string name()
{
char *p = abi::__cxa_demangle(typeid(T).name(), 0, 0, 0);
std::string r(p);
free(p);
return(r);
}
};
#include <boost/mpl/apply.hpp>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::cout <<
type_info2<boost::mpl::apply<METAFUNCION, int>::type>::name() <<
std::endl;
std::cout <<
type_info2<boost::mpl::apply<METAFUNCION, HELPER<float, double> >::type>::name() <<
std::endl;
std::cout <<
type_info2<boost::mpl::apply<METAFUNCION2, HELPER<float, double> >::type>::name() <<
std::endl;
return(0);
}
The output:
int
double
double
That surprised me a bit as I expected:
int
HELPER<float, double>
double
Now, I know that code like above does not compile under Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 (I don't remeber the message but it was something along the lines that I cannot specialize apply struct inside METAFUNCTION2 struct).
So my question is - is this g++ behaviour conformant with the standard? I have a strong feeling that there is something wrong here but I am not 100% sure.
For the curious - I have the behaviuor as I expected when I redefine METAFUNCTION2 this way:
struct METAFUNCION2 : METAFUNCION
{
template<class T>
struct apply : METAFUNCION::apply<T>
{
};
template<class T1, class T2>
struct apply<HELPER<T1, T2> > : METAFUNCION::apply<T2>
{
};
};