Could anyone please compare Axis2 and Sun metro web service based on following parameters?
Speed
Hot Deployment
Flexibility
Stability
Composition and Extensibility
Security
Document availability and easy to use.
views:
761answers:
3
A:
I prefer pure JAX-WS instead of Axis2. It's really nice! The only case when I used Axis1 is for java 1.4 compatibility (on client side).
IMHO, JAX-WS is a reference implementation of web-service stack from sun, when Axis is just a try to be real ws. Why not to google? There are a lot of info :)
gedevan
2009-09-23 17:46:51
As a side note, JAX-WS is the "standard," Metro is the reference implementation.
R. Bemrose
2009-09-23 18:00:52
Agree, but metro distribution build around the JAX-WS :)
gedevan
2009-09-23 19:52:18
@R. Bemrose: JAX-WS (JSR 224) is the standard, JAX-WS is the also the name of the reference implementation. Metro combines JAX-WS and other libraries e.g. JAX-B and WSIT.
wierob
2009-10-13 17:47:27
+2
A:
Metro is just the reference implementation of JAX-WS. Incidentally, it's included in j2ee 5 / Java 6.
Metro isn't that hard to use, either... as long as you have access to the command line for wsgen (for the server-side) and wsimport (for the client side), that is.
The biggest problem with JAX-WS and Metro specifically is that Eclipse's support for it is quite bad.
Note: There are other implementations of the JAX-WS standard; Metro's just good if you don't want to install additional libraries.
R. Bemrose
2009-09-23 18:10:21
+1
A:
Your criterias are covered in an article comparing Axis2 and JAX-WS RI / Metro
baranco
2010-01-16 13:06:06